Answer:
The answer is
A. 26.46%
B. $5,958,354.88
Explanation:
A.
IRR = CFo/(1 + IRR)^0 + CF1/(1 + IRR)^1 + CF2/(1 + IRR)^2 + CF3/(1 + IRR)^3 + CF4/(1 + IRR)^4 + CF5/(1 + IRR)^5
CFo = -$10,000,000
CF1 = $3,000,000
CF2 = $3,500,000
CF3 = $4,000,000
CF4 = $4,900,000
CF5 = $5,000,000
Using a financial calculator;
IRR = 26.46%
B.
NPV = -CFo + CF1/(1+ r)^1 + CF2/(1 +r)^2 + CF3/(1 + r)^3 + CF4/(1 + r)^4 + CF5/(1 + r)^5
CFo = -$10,000,000
CF1 = $3,000,000
CF2 = $3,500,000
CF3 = $4,000,000
CF4 = $4,900,000
CF5 = $5,000,000
Using a financial calculator;
NPV = $5,958,354.88
Answer:
conflict caused by the hardware store adopting "scrambled merchandising" marketing.
Explanation:
Scrambled merchandising occurs when a shop sells a good that is not the usual type of products it sells. A store owner may adopt scrambled merchandising to utilise unused space or to increase bottom line.
When a store owner sells many unrelated goods it gives the buyer the impression that the seller does not specialise in a particular type of product.
The conflict in this case arises through scrambled merchandising. A hardware store starts to sell ice cream like our own business.
Answer: The correct option is C. One, zero.
Explanation:
When income elasticity is greater than one, it indicates that the quantity demanded is greater than the rise in income.
As quantity demanded increases, it will lead to a decrease in price to the extent that the percentage change in price will outweigh the percentage change in quantity demanded, meaning that the price elasticity is greater than zero.
When these two elasticities are combined, the resulting effect will be an increase in the level of consumer spending on smartphones.
Answer:
a. $880.
Explanation:
Bailey bought a bond for $1,000 that promises to pay $110 a year.
The interest rate was 110/1000 * 100 = 11%
This year, $1,000 receives $125 a year= 125/1000 * 100 = 12.5%. So, this year the interest rate now rises to 12.5%.
If Bailey were to sell his (old) bond, the price should be 110/12.5% = 110/0.125 = $880.
Answer:
A) 30
Explanation:
to determine in how many years the economy will double with an 8% growth rate, we can use the rule of 72. The rule of 72 basically works by dividing 72 by the compounding growth rate to determine the number of years it will take an investment to double.
The rule of 72 works well when growth rate is between 6-10%, at 8% it is quite exact. For lower growth rates you should use the rule of 70 which is basically the same but instead of using 72, you use 70. For growth rates over 10% you should use 69.3.
the number of years for the economy to double = 72/8 = 9 years, so 9 plus 20 = 29 years. Since the question asks at what age the economy should have more than doubled, it would be a little over 29, and in this case it is 30.
You can always check which number is more exact calculating 1.08⁹ = 1.999
