The requirement of Kameron, Candice, and Leo should be for pledging the personal assets in order to give the guarantee for the payment obligations with respect to the PU.
The information related to the pledged asset is as follows:
- A pledged asset is a valuable possession that could be transferred to the lender in order to secure the debt or a loan.
- The pledged asset should be considered as collateral that could be held by a lender and in return, it is for lending the funds.
- Also, it can decrease the down payment that should be needed for the loan along with this if there is any change in the interest rate so the same should be decreased.
Therefore we can conclude that, the requirement done by these three people is needed for pledging the personal assets in order to give the guarantee for the payment obligations with respect to the PU.
Learn more about the LLC here: brainly.com/question/1214636
<span>Sales during the last four periods are in the order from older to recent as 100, 200, 130, and 300.
Moving average is a successive average calculated from the successive segments.
So the third month moving average MA3 = (200 + 130 + 300) / 3 = 630 / 3 = 210
So the answer is 210.</span>
This answer is FALSE - FUN FACT - Liquidity of money refers to the ease with which the owner of an asset can convert it into cash it is easier to convert common stocks into cash rather than attempt to raise cash from sale or mortgage of real estate assets
Answer:
The answer is Substitutes.
Explanation:
For cross-price elasticity we can either have substitute goods or compliment goods. If the cross-price elasticity is positive, then the goods are substitutes and If the cross-price elasticity is negative, then the goods are compliments.
In this example, the cross-price elasticity is 0.31. This answer is postive, meaning, beer and wine are substitutes.
So 1% increase in price of wine will make demand of beer to rise by 0.31.
It can't be complement s because it is not negative.
It can't be necessities because this does not relate to cross-price elasticity