Answer:
by SAS only
Step-by-step explanation:
based on the diagram we only have one side and one angle explicitly identified as equivalent.
but we have an implicit confirmation of the second side QS to the enclosed angle, because the triangles are presented that this side is the same for both triangles.
so, SAS applies (but no other, as we don't have any information on the 3rd side).
The given expression (8h + 2w - 5h + 3w) can fully be simplified as 3h + 5w.
<h3>What is an expression?</h3>
An expression can be defined as a type of mathematical equation which is used to show the relationship that is existing between two or more variables and numerical quantities (integers).
In this exercise, you're required to fully simplify the given expression in the lowest terms. Thus, we would simplify the given expression completely by collecting like terms and performing the necessary arithmetic operations (addition and subtraction) as follows:
Collecting like terms, we have:
8h - 5h + 3w + 2w
Subtracting and adding the like terms respectively, we have:
3h + 5w.
In conclusion, we can logically deduce that the given expression (8h + 2w - 5h + 3w) can fully be simplified as 3h + 5w.
Read more on expressions here: brainly.com/question/12189823
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Fully simplify 8h + 2w - 5h + 3w.
264/2200 = 0.12
0.12*100 = 12%
[8] The hypotenuses must be congruent, DE and IJ
HL is hypotenuse-leg, or where the hypotenuse and one leg are congruent.
Since we see a leg is congruent, to prove they are congruent with HL we will need to know that the hypotenuses are congruent.
[9] Another leg, AC and YX
LL is leg-leg. Since we have one leg, we will need the other leg to prove the triangles are congruent by LL.
[10] A leg, DE and E? or FE and E?
LA means leg-angle. The angles by point E are vertical angles, so they will be congruent. To finish prooving the congruence using LA we will also need a leg.
-> The question marks are because the letters are too blurry to read.
Where are the following set of words
