Answer:
A. The first cash flow of an annuity due is made on the first day of the agreement.
G. The last cash flow of an ordinary annuity is made on the last day covered by the agreement.
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
As we know that
Future value after 4 years is
= Annual deposit × Cumulative FV factor at 9% for 4 periods of an ordinary annuity
= $6,000 × 4.57313
= $27,439
Therefore the above statements are true and the same is to be considered
Hence, all other statements are incorrect
A mission statement defines the company vision and objectives.
A vision statement focuses more on the future goals and is usually longer than a mission statement because it covers things company purpose, goals, how it will be achieved, etc.
Answer:
4 years
Explanation:
Payback period is the time in which a project returns back the initial investment in the form of net cash flow.
Initial Investment = $280,000
Net Income = $20,000
To calculate the net cash flows add bask the depreciation expense in Net income each year.
Depreciation = ($280,000 - $30,000) / 5 = $50,000
Net Cash Flow = $20,000 + $50,000 = $70,000
Payback period = Initial Investment / yearly cash flow = $280,000 / $70,000 = 4 years
Answer:
The correct answer is True.
Explanation:
When an intoxicated person enters into a contract, the contract can either be enforceable, meaning held to the fullest extent of the law, or voidable by the intoxicated person. The court will look at two criteria that need to be present in order to make the contract voidable:
-
The intoxication was severe enough that the person entering into the contract was incapacitated.
-
The other party was aware of the intoxication at the time.
A voidable contract, in this instance, is one in which the intoxicated party can end the agreement under certain terms. To expand on the criteria above, in order for the intoxicated person to void the contract, there needs to be adequate proof that one of the following occurred:
-
The intoxicated person consumed enough alcohol or drugs to cause impairment in thinking sufficient enough that he could not understand the legal ramifications of entering into the contract.
-
The other party to the contract knew of the intoxication.
