<span>A company can have a product that they want a single customer to be able to use and profit from, they may sell that product to that customer at a lower price, allowing them to purchase more, and blocking out competitors with higher pricing.</span>
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Answer:
Legal and environmental.
Explanation:
PEST is a short form for political, economic, social, and technological factors. These are external factors likely to impact business performance. Entrepreneurs should analyze, understand them, and include their effects in business plans.
Other external factors that may affect business performance are legal and environmental.
For the legal factors, an entrepreneur should analyze the impact of possible changes in laws and legal interpretations on their businesses. In the environmental analysis, the entrepreneur should be aware of the industry's environmental regulations and restrictions. They should plan for possible changes in license limitations.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Cost-benefit analysis".
Explanation:
The cost-benefit analysis also referred to as Benefit-cost analysis, is a strategic approach to evaluating the weaknesses and strengths of approaches used only to define solutions that provide the best strategy for generating advantages while retaining costs.
This can be used to assess implemented or future actions or to measure the benefit of decision, initiative or program costs.
Therefore, this will be the right answer.
