Answer:
okay for #2 do 3 times 3.14 divided by 4
Step-by-step explanation:
do that and tell me what you get
Graph A is the correct one
Answer: he used 6 lemons for each pitcher so answer is =6
That would be 0.2
Hope this helps. :)
Answer:
(B) Because the confidence interval includes 0, we don't have convincing evidence that sugar causes faster reading times, on average.
Step-by-step explanation:
Confidence Interval for the population mean difference in reading is basically an interval of range of values where the true population mean difference in reading time can be found with a certain level of confidence.
Mathematically,
Confidence Interval = (Sample mean) ± (Margin of error)
In using confidence interval of population mean difference in reading times for hypothesis testing, if the interval obtained contains a value of 0, it means the population mean difference in reading times can take on a value of 0 and indicate that there isn't enough evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the two quantities being compared. (The null hypothesis is true).
If the interval doesn't contain a 0, then it can be concluded that there is enough evidence to conclude that there is significant difference in the two quantities being compared.
Hope this Helps!!!
