The Americans formed a republic, a government in which citizens rule through
<span>"Elected representatives", since this is what primarily differentiates between a "direct democracy" and a "representative democracy". </span><span />
Answer:
the question of whether slavery should be allowed in new territories
Explanation:
What led to the outbreak of the bloodiest conflict in the history of North America? A common explanation is that the Civil War was fought over the moral issue of slavery. In fact, it was the economics of slavery and political control of that system that was central to the conflict.
Answer:
The consumer or buyer and the free market due to lack of competition.
Explanation:
They essentially dictated the rules. They had a monopoly and could exploit consumers by charging any price they wanted and by stifling free market competition thus limiting innovation and further development in their fields.
Answer:
Can you pease send the rest of the Question?
Explanation:
Hey there!
The answer is A. That slavery was still allowed in a free nation.
One of the things the colonists fought for was freedom. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and freedom of the press along with other things.
However, for hundreds of thousands of slaves torn away from their homes, they had none of these freedoms. They were considered inferior and not people.
A paradox is a statement that seems absurd of self-contradictory, which this statement very much is. If the U.S. is a free nation, then why do hundreds of thousands of people living there have no freedoms, stolen from them by the very people who advocated for their own freedom?
Hope this helps!
