The author has used rhetorical devices like parallelism to emphasize the miserable and hopeless condition of the migrants who were despised and hated but had no option but to swarm the town to fight hunger and survive.
<u>Explanation
:</u>
The chapter talks about the agrarians who were ruined by industrialization. Industries and technology pushed them on the roads. They moved in search of food and to give their families a meal to survive.
Parallelism has been employed at places to underline the misery, the dejection and distress.
For instance, in one of the paragraphs, just to stress on the simplicity of the agrarian folks before they were brought near to doom: ‘a simple agrarian folk who had not changed …….. who had not farmed. They had not grown up….’
This repetition of phrases and clauses is parallelism. The chapter is replete with such examples. It lends it unity and realism and appeals to emotions.
There has to be multiple choice answers or something.
It's certainly sensory. And it's figurative too. I think I'd pick figurative because the central piece of language is a simile. That's pretty good use of language when you compare the bobbing heads of flowers to helmeted soldiers.
Main Points, Transitions and Quotations would be the best answer for this.
Answer:
The prince's thought shows that it is not possible to pay a life with another life, that is, he shows that killing Romeo will not pay the debt for Mercutio's death, besides that whoever kills Romeo, will have the same debt as him.
Explanation:
When the prince asks "Who now the price of his dear blood doth owe?" he is showing that Mercutio's life is priceless, nothing will make Romeo pay for this life and neither Romeo nor anyone can bring Mercutio back, that is, it is useless to kill Romeo and turn another citizen of the city into a murderer. Therefore, the best punishment is to exile Romeo and let him suffer the consequences of his own actions.
