5. According to John Green, Luther's success with the rebellion stemmed from his ability to, initially, make his teachings resonate with peasants and youths. But this resonance did not last long. Luther soon turned his teachings against the peasants in favor of the kings and princes.
6. <em>Luther's or the peasants' argument</em> about serfdom was correct. No one should endure bondage or serfdom, with increasing taxation without representation.
7. The reasons that Princes and Kings defied the Pope and broke away from the Church were<em> to possess landed property formerly owned by the Church (</em><em>Wealth</em><em>)</em>, <em>decide how they practiced religion (e.g. </em><em>divorce</em><em>)</em>, <em>and boost their </em><em>military powers</em><em> </em>(making people loyal to the government instead of to the Church).
8. The Reformation was ultimately a wrong move because it split the Church, creating too many denominations with different and confusing interpretations of the Bible. However, there are some valuable lessons. It separated the Church from the state. It created religious freedom.
The Church has no business mingling with the state. The Church and the state should remain separate, complementing each other like institutions. Governments should not regulate religion because it is a <em>personal endeavor</em>. It is a <em>spiritual enterprise</em> and not <em>social or economic</em>. There are some aspects of life in which the state should not involve itself. Otherwise, individual rights suffer jeopardy.
Thus, the Reformation was a bag of the good and the ugly. Reformation should happen <em>within and not without</em> the Church. Luther's outcome seems to be projected from Satan. Any Reformation outside the Church is no Reformation. It is simply Separation and Division, generating Confusion.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/18535898
Answer:
To empasish the importance of when and who signed the treaty
Explanation:
According to many the beginning of Spain's decline in power can be dated to the economic hardship that arose during the first years of his rule.
He shared his father's opinion and point of view but did not preserve the industry he developed. Philip II predicted that his son would not be able to lead his kingdoms on his own, and that there would be puppets for various ministers and courtiers. He was right, too; immediately after his death, Philip IIII entrusted all political affairs to the Duke of Lerma and his son.
Explanation:
- The carefree king's private life, who cared neither for politics nor for his country, consisted of balls and court festivals, to which huge amounts of money were thrown.
- His reign represented a critical period in Spanish history.
Class: History
Level: Middle school
Keywords: Philip III, economic hardship
Learn more on History of Spain on
brainly.com/question/5792460
brainly.com/question/1527848
brainly.com/question/7541557
brainly.com/question/7541557
#learnwithBrainly
The Christians and muslims
