Answer: Researchers agree that schizophrenia is about <u>80%</u> heritable.
Explanation:
This mental illness can be hereditary in most family when there is a diangises. However, it does not have to be a close family member such as a mother, brother, sister, or father. This mental illness can be passed down generations and skipped generations. Uncles, cousins, and a grandparent from the past may have suffered from schizophrenia. In addition, Autism is another illness that can be hereditary.
This mental illness is not based on genetics alone, and each family will be spoken to by a medical professor to see where the mental illness originated. There are still 20% of people <u> </u> with schizophrenia that have no family that has the mental illness.
Answer: Catton's analysis on the two generals (General Grant and General Lee) focused on their contrasts and similarities.
Explanation: Although both generals were on opposing sides and had some fundamental differences, they had many similarities according to Catton's analysis which are:
1. They were both excellent fighters
2. Both have similar fighting techniques and qualities
3. Both were determined and loyal
4. Both were daring and resourceful
5. After the war, both quickly adjusted to the peace and were instrumental in bringing the two factions together quickly to form a unified nation.
Answer:
Sounds like a smear campaign
Explanation:
he is calling the other person's morality into question by putting the thought of "how could that candidate let that poor boy die." into the minds of the watcher 'smearing' the publics idea of the opposition.
She went to Beverly Hills High School. Instead of college she joined the Ballet Russe de Monte Carlo, a highly acclaimed Russian ballet troupe based in New York City.
Answer:
d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.
Explanation:
An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.
In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.
