1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
True [87]
3 years ago
8

(4x+3) = (7x-6) more math :)

Mathematics
2 answers:
Sphinxa [80]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

4x+3=7x-6

Add six to both sides

4x+9=7x

Than subtract four x on both sides

9/3=3x

Than divide by 3 on both sides

Than the answer will be

X=3

Ilia_Sergeevich [38]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

X=3

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Which point is a solution to the inequality shown in this graph
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

D: (1,5) Apex

Step-by-step explanation:


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Luis wants to buy a home priced at $315,000. He plans to finance this amount less the down payment required. His
sveta [45]

Answer:

d Luis is not eligible for a loan, he should reduce his recurring debt

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A painter leans a 13ft ladder against a house. The base of the ladder is 5ft from the house. How high on the house does the ladd
lakkis [162]

Answer:

13,92838827718412‬ft

Step-by-step explanation:

a² + b² = c²

a = 13ft

b = 5ft

169 + 25 = 194

c = √194

c = 13,92838827718412‬ft

6 0
3 years ago
Write an indirect proof showing that the diagonals of a parallelogram intersect each other
____ [38]
Its an indirect proof, so 3 steps :-
1) you start with the opposite of wat u need to prove 
2) arrive at a contradiction
3) concludeReport · 29/6/2015261
since you wanto prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', you start wid the opposite of above statement, like below :- step1 : Since we want to prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', lets start by assuming the opposite, that the diagonals of parallelogram dont bisect each other.Report · 29/6/2015261


Since, we assumed that the diagonals dont bisect each other, 
OC≠OA 
OD≠OBReport · 29/6/2015261
Since, OC≠OA, △OAD is not congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261

∠AOD≅∠BOC as they are vertical angles, 
∠OAD≅∠OCB they are alternate interior angles 
AD≅BC, by definition of parallelogram 
so, by AAS, △OAD is congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
But, thats a contradiction as we have previously established that those triangles are congruentReport · 29/6/2015261
step3 :
since we arrived at a contradiction, our assumption is wrong. so, the opposite of our assumption must be correct. so diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other.
4 0
3 years ago
Rewrite 302+40=342 in a different way, using the commutative of addition
bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

40+32=342

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the commutative of addition change the position of 302 and 40 the expression is 40+302=342 [analysis]

7 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Problem 2 Previous Problem Problem List Next Problem (1 point) Determine ifv is an eigenvector of the matrix A No 1 5 0 0 7 0 -2
    6·1 answer
  • Graph the piecewise function on the blank coordinate plane below. Please explain this to me step by step I don't fully understan
    10·1 answer
  • Half the difference between the fourth multiple of a number and 16 is 6. What is the number?
    7·1 answer
  • 4. In your own words, describe what a treatment is in an experiment.
    8·1 answer
  • The sum of 2 and three times a number equals 14 find the number
    7·2 answers
  • -7/20 as a decimal number
    10·2 answers
  • 8 rows of 7 squares.<br> What is 56 ÷ 7?
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!
    15·1 answer
  • Please help i put this question so many times i need help or else ill fail
    8·1 answer
  • Choose a value for n, and then evaluate n^2.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!