1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Andrew [12]
2 years ago
9

What happens when three-fourths of the states ratify an amendment? (3 points)

History
1 answer:
Alborosie2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

3rd one

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Critics of president bush’s education initiative that required annual testing of students felt that it raised standards to level
Elden [556K]

The people that criticized Bush's  education initiative said that teachers would focus too much on tests and neglect other subjects.

<h3>What was President Bush's education initiative?</h3>

This was the no child left behind act that the President enacted in the year 2002.

The aim of the policy was to ensure that all the students in the United States had quality education.

Read more on the policy here: brainly.com/question/18980779

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
How does Odysseus's greatest strength become his weakness?
torisob [31]

In The Odyssey, Odysseus’ greatest strength is his trust and his compassion to his men.  Though he trusted and is compassionate to his men, this will only become his strength if his men follow his orders.  This same strength became his weakness when his men didn’t follow his instructions as he is also seen as a boastful person.

6 0
3 years ago
What statement about pinochet's regime in chile is true?
kenny6666 [7]
The statement that Pinochet was a fascist is true because he took power with the aid of the CIA and killed Allende and repressed his people with the police  and military with heinous crimes like slitting their stomachs and throwing them into the ocean from helicopters and torturing them for their political views. He disappeared many men who were of progressive politics. 
7 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast Hobbes’ and Locke’s views of human nature and the role government should play
svet-max [94.6K]

Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another.  This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.

John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience.  Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.

Further explanation:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em>  in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

8 0
3 years ago
How dose Banking Work? WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!!
MakcuM [25]

Answer:

Just read the steps

Explanation:

Banks work by paying its customers to lend them money. The depositing customer gains a small amount of money in return (interest on savings), and the lending customer pays a larger amount of money to the bank in return (interest on loans). To make money for itself, the bank keeps the difference.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • fter the Boston Tea Party, the British government closed the port of Boston until order was restored and the cost of the lost te
    14·2 answers
  • Select ALL the correct texts in the passage.
    14·1 answer
  • We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain una
    14·2 answers
  • Which scenario would mostly likely take place under athens jury system?
    9·1 answer
  • Describe the physical features of the majority of greece.
    13·1 answer
  • GONNA UPVOTE
    11·1 answer
  • Diary Entry Write at least 3 dlary entries (1-2 paragraphs each ) from the point of view of someone who migrated during the Grea
    15·1 answer
  • Base your answers to the question on the drawing and on your knowledge of social studies.
    10·1 answer
  • What was the outcome of the Mexican revolution
    9·2 answers
  • Who is current priminister in Bhutan?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!