The <span>Upwelling is caused by southerly winds that blow over the ocean surface near the Peru coastline.
The wind causes the water to move and replace the water on the top surface with the water from the deeper surface, creating a change in both temperature and nutrient composition of the water.</span>
Answer:
1
The action of Pfizer is no way near an ethical act and was a clear violation of the ethical standards.This is true because
- As it is the company responsibility to act ethically to achieve the goals of the society by eradicating their problems and not by enhancing them hence the corporate social responsibility would not allow the company to behave inhumanly
- The duty based ethics would also empower the corporation to care and respect humanity
- Its is highly unethical on the part of Pfizer to conduct test on human life.if we consider the six basic guidelines to make ethical decisions then they have done it in a highly unethical manner.The six basic guidelines would never allow any company to behave i such a manner so as to risk the human life
Pfizer did not obey any of the above ethical standards and the conduct was clear violation of ethical standard.
2
Pfizer plc is not guilty of any ethical standard violation as it is a common practice for drug manufacturer to conduct tests on animals as well as human.And anyways the company conducted the tests on those human beings who will die with the epidermic which has already invaded the entire country of Nigeria.Hence in other to save/protect a large number of human being the test on the few persons is ethical as it is done to protect the society at large
So we cannot say that the company had violated any ethical standard
3
In order for Pfizer to avert the consequences of the violation then Pfizer should use the following five steps to create solution tom problem on ethical question these steps include
- Inquiry : It is very crucial to make initial inquiry about the entire subject matter
- Discussion: If there is a list of action generated after inquiry then discussion on every single action should be made
- Decision : It is highly crucial to take any decision with the consensus of all the participating candidates
- Justification : Each decision made must have a justification for the entire process
- Evaluation : it is highly crucial to evaluate the entire process
Explanation:
The correct would be option C, Planting a series of different crops each year.
Charlemagne's new technique for farmers to increase nutrients in the soil involved Planting a series of different crops each year.
Explanation:
Charlemagne was a King of the Francs. He was a great emperor and ruled the Francs, Lombard and Romans during his empire. He was very much involved with his people. He was concerned about the agricultural development in his territories.
He introduced a new technique to the farmers of his region to increase the nutrients in the soil. He told them to plant a series of different crops each year. This will increase the nutrients in the soil. Every year, new crops will be planted, and the soil remain fertile and will give more crops each year.
Learn more about Charlemagne at:
brainly.com/question/423792
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
The correct answer is: Release from proactive interference.
Explanation:
Proactive interference occurs when an individual memorizes a list of information, (be it names, ideas, formulas) and when trying to remember a last part of that list, an initial information suddenly get's in the way.
For example, Lucas first memorized the name of the cities of Spain and then the name of the cities of Italy. When trying to recall the name of the cities of Italy he suddenly starts remembering the names of the city of Spain that he previously was not able to recall.
In this particular case, when reviewing the new terms for the upcoming biology test, the performance for the french vocabulary words was noticeably better, because I was experiencing Release from proactive interference.
