Answer:
a-1. The present value of Plan 1 = $93.08
a-2. The deal 2 which involves paying immediately adn taking the 10% discount is better.
Explanation:
a-1.
The interest rate of 5% is taken as the discount rate to convert future cash flows into the present value.
The First payment plan with installments has a present value of,
Present Value-Plan 1 = 25 + 25/1.05 + 25/1.05² + 25/1.05³ = $93.08
a-2.
The first plan will cost $93.08 in the present value.
The second plan will involve immediate payment and a discount of 10%vwhch makes the present value of plan 2 as $90 (100 - (100*0.1)).
Thus, the second deal or deal involving immediate payment and taking the discount is better.
Answer: Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
National Savings is divided into two parts, private savings and public savings.
Private Savings = GDP - Taxes + Transfer payments - Consumption Spending
= Y - T + TR - C
= 12 - 3 + 2 - 9
= $ 2 trillion
Public Savings = Taxes - Government Spending - Transfer payments
= 3 - 0 - 2
= $1 trillion
∴ Option (C) is correct.
Private saving = $2 trillion and public saving = $1 trillion.
Answer: True
Explanation:
Yes, the given statement is true that the employing capital rationing is one of the process in which it placing some restriction on the investment amount of the project in an organization.
In the capital rationing strategy, if the company accepts less amount from all its prospective projects along with some positive net profit value (NPVs) the it is evaluated on the basis of their own risk.
The employ capital rationing helps in making various types of decisions related to investment for the company and in this system only limited projects are taken due to the limitation of the resources.
Therefore, The given statement is true.
Answer:
If Jenny doesn’t earn any interest on her savings and wants to perfectly smooth consumption across her life, how much will she consume every year?
Jenny's total income during her life = income as tax analyst ($60,000 x 10) + income as PhD student ($12,000 x 5) + income as Art Director (35 x $95,000) = $3,985,000
she generated income during 50 years and expects to live 20 more, so in order to perfectly smooth consumption across her life, she must divide her total life income by 70 years = $3,985,000 / 70 years = $56,928.57 per year
What might prevent her from perfectly smoothing consumption?
First of all, besides inflation, you also earn interest on your savings. That is why 401k and other retirement accounts work so well (the magic of compound interest). Even if inflation and interests didn't exist, you cannot know exactly what you are going to earn in the future and for how many years. In this case, she earned $60,000 for 10 years, but then earned only $12,000 during 5 years. If she really wanted to smooth her consumption, she would have needed to get a loan because her savings during the first 10 years wouldn't be enough.
Answer:
it enables people to use money wisely
Explanation:
this is because a specific amount of money will be provided for a specific reason
