Answer:
slaves aren't paid for thier work, and masters receive the profit so C.
May not be captured at night in most regions - solar energy.
releases CO2 into the atmosphere - biomass.
might vent toxic underground gases - geothermal energy.
HOPE THIS HELPS YOU!
ALL ARE CORRECT! ^o^
ALSO, PLEASE DO GIVE ME BRAINLIEST BECAUSE I'VE TO GET 50 OF 'EM! >_<
Answer:
guns, cannons, and war tactics were changed sue to the fact that the Europeans now had more accurate long ranged weapons
Explanation:
BRAINLIEST PLZ
The controversy that surrounded the Great Zimbabwe Ruins until the early 1900s was to establish that African society did not build Great Zimbabwe and it is done by some other migrant society.
There were lots of political pressure put to deny the African people's role in the Great Zimbabwe ruins.
Explanation
Great Zimbabwe was an ancient city that was spread around 1,779 acres containing huge stone walls of height 11 m.
They were built around 11th to 15th century.
Building such a huge city with stones by African people were unbelievable to archaeologists and other historians.
Some believed that an alien civilization had built it while some referred it to as a biblical site where Solomon had kept 'Ophir' gold.
It is important to understand that the construction of identities, when analyzed in contemporary times, must be viewed from two dimensions: “Conflicting diversity within the nation-state (regions, ethnic issues, etc.) and the emergence of transnational identity references. For example, the world of consumption. Different social groups can thus appropriate globalized symbolic references (from Madonna to hip-hop) to construct their own image, their “identity”. There is, therefore, a situation within which different "identities" complement or enter into dispute. The monopoly that the state had (or thought it had) collapsed. The construction of national identity must now be done in a context of diversification that previously did not exist, technological transformations are obviously important, but one should not fall into a reductionist temptation that gives technologies a transformative capacity that they do not possess. The world will no longer be democratic because the technologies we have are more sophisticated. Today there is a certain technological panacea that often deludes us. Social problems will not be solved with 'more technology' or 'less'.
