Answer:
New Mexico
Explanation:
Follow the arrow on this map.
Answer:
Move to the middle and wait for a safe opening to turn
Explanation:
Driver should not rush
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The economy of the New South was different from—and similar to—the economy of the past in the following way.
The New South is similar in that the use of labor to work the farmlands continued, not with the use of slaves as before Reconstruction, but with low paid labor that did not have the same rights and growth opportunities and whites had.
Let's remember that before the Civil War and Reconstruction, the economy of the South totally depended on slavery. Wealthy landlords had to use slaves to work in the large southern plantations to produce the kinds of crops that had to be exported to Europe.
After Reconstruction, there was no more slavery in the South, but cruel legislation such as the Jim Crow laws and the black codes severely limited the rights of African Americans.
The economy of the New South is different in that the industry of the North arrived at the South, offering different labor conditions to African Americans that used to depend on working in agriculture. The arrival of industries really changed the agricultural economy of the South, although event today agriculture plays an important role in the South, under different labor conditions.
The power of government to regulate is sometimes referred to as jurisdiction.
The first settlement of the Americas began when Paleolithic hunter-gatherers first entered North America from the North Asian Mammoth steppe via the Beringia land bridge, which had formed between northeastern Siberia and western Alaska due to the lowering of sea level during the Last Glacial Maximum. These populations expanded south of the Laurentide Ice Sheet and rapidly throughout both North and South America, by 14,000 years ago.[1][2][3][4] The earliest populations in the Americas, before roughly 10,000 years ago, are known as Paleo-Indians.
The peopling of the Americas is a long-standing open question, and while advances in archaeology, Pleistocene geology, physical anthropology, and DNA analysis have shed progressively more light on the subject, significant questions remain unresolved.[5] While there is general agreement that the Americas were first settled from Asia, the pattern of migration, its timing, and the place(s) of origin in Eurasia of the peoples who migrated to the Americas remain unclear.[2] In 2019, a study by the University of Cambridge and University of Copenhagen concluded that Native Americans are the closest relatives to the 10,000-year-old inhabitants of the Kolyma River in northeastern Siberia.[6]
The prevalent migration models outline different time frames for the Asian migration from the Bering Straits and subsequent dispersal of the founding population throughout the continent.[7] Indigenous peoples of the Americas have been linked to Siberian populations by linguistic factors, the distribution of blood types, and in genetic composition as reflected by molecular data, such as DNA.[8]
The "Clovis first theory" refers to the 1950s hypothesis that the Clovis culture represents the earliest human presence in the Americas, beginning about 13,000 years ago; evidence of pre-Clovis cultures has accumulated since 2000, pushing back the possible date of the first peopling of the Americas to about 13,200–15,500 years ago.
