1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ostrovityanka [42]
3 years ago
15

Please help i got points What are the two reason a person can appeal a court case decision?

Law
2 answers:
FromTheMoon [43]3 years ago
5 0

Appeals in either civil or criminal cases are usually based on arguments that there were errors in the trial's procedure or errors in the judge's interpretation of the law. The party appealing is called the appellant, or sometimes the petitioner.

thank you, and may I have Brainliest? :)

frosja888 [35]3 years ago
5 0
Violations of due process or expedited trial
You might be interested in
Who was the first president of UK​
MArishka [77]
The two other answers to this question are spot on, but I'm going to interpret this question in a different way. I'm going to answer it as if the question said "Who was the first presidential style Prime Minister of UK?"

I would argue that there have been two 'Presidents of the United Kingdom': Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair.

For the first eight years of her administration, Margaret Thatcher was effectively 'the President of the United Kingdom'. Her administration was able to do things most post war PMs were not able to do, possibly buoyed by the large mandates she was given by the British public in 1979 and 1983.

Given the landslide election of 1997, it became almost impossible for the Conservative party to win the 2001 election, and very unlikely that would would have much of a chance in 2005 (Michael Portillo's words, not just mine). With this sort of a political landscape and public mandate, Blair was able to govern as a de-facto president, allowing him to push through parliament decisions that didn't have, not only, the public's backing but even the backing of much of the Labour party. This can be seen in Blair's decisions regarding Iraq and Afghanistan post 9/11.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(ASAP 100 POINTS AND BRAINLIEST) To what extent, if any, do jury trials ensure due process as stated in the Constitution and Bil
vagabundo [1.1K]

Answer:

The Fifth Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law."

The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
How many Newton's (N) of force are needed to accelerate a 100 kg at 4 m/s2?​
Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

Force = 400 Newton

Explanation:

Given the following data;

Mass = 100 kg

Acceleration = 4m/s²

Newton's Second Law of Motion states that the acceleration of a physical object is directly proportional to the net force acting on the physical object and inversely proportional to its mass.

Mathematically, it is given by the formula;

Force = mass * acceleration

Hence, to find the force needed, we would use the above formula.

Substituting into the formula, we have;

Force = 100 * 4

Force = 400 Newton

5 0
3 years ago
Both the federal government and the state governments levy taxes on its citizens. This is an example of which type of power?
Trava [24]

Answer:

Concurrent power

Explanation:

Concurrent power is a political power exercised by both Federal and State government at the same time within the same jurisdiction as it relates to their citizens on a subject matter. Examples of Concurrent power enjoyed by both levels of government are in the area of taxation, environmental protection, election regulation, etc.

5 0
3 years ago
I need to write an apology letter. The victims name is Alana. Basically, I got angry because I was yelling and I assaulted her a
Nuetrik [128]

Answer:

see what happened was i was angry.im sorry i broke your nose and you must be in a lot of pain.it is wrong that i assaulted you because i shouldnt have laid hands on you in the first place even if im angry.im truly very sorry for my actions towards you and in the future i know to keep my hands to my self even if im angry.

Explanation:

can i get brainliest

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 10. What does a Nonresident Minors Certificate do?
    15·1 answer
  • Be careful with some of the zoom links posted on here, some of them are definately not child appropriate. if you are that despar
    14·1 answer
  • 1 point
    5·2 answers
  • How much does a U.S custom make in EL Paso, Tx?
    11·1 answer
  • If you're caught driving with you could be punished with up to a
    12·1 answer
  • Good morning guys! And I hope y’all having a great day brainless just updated there terms&services
    14·1 answer
  • An act under the other acts exception must have occurred
    10·1 answer
  • Why am always alone T-T​
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following amendments would protect you in the scenario found in the following question?
    9·1 answer
  • 10 points
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!