1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vitfil [10]
3 years ago
15

A reversible error is: a. any mistake made in a case. b. one that might have affected the outcome of a case. c. determined durin

g a motion for summary judgment. d. none of the above
Law
1 answer:
Rama09 [41]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

b. one that might have affected the outcome of a case.

Explanation:

A reversible error is an error of sufficient gravity to warrant reversal of a judgment on appeal. It is an error by the trier of law (judge), or the trier of fact (the jury, or the judge if it is a bench trial), or malfeasance by one of the trying attorneys, which results in an unfair trial. It is to be distinguished from harmless errors which do not rise to a level which brings the validity of the judgment into question and thus do not lead to a reversal upon appeal.

You might be interested in
Waterfront Hotels Corporation in Boston offers a job to Carol, who lives in Denver. Carol orally agrees to work for Waterfront f
Aneli [31]

Answer: Waterfront Hotels.

Explanation: The lack of an official, written agreement will make the court likely to rule in favor of Waterfront Hotels.

8 0
3 years ago
Drag the tiles to the boxes to complete the pairs.
daser333 [38]

Answer:

what are options o did not understand this question

6 0
3 years ago
One weakness of the articles of confederation was that congress could not
Kay [80]

Answer:

COULD NOT RAISE TAXES

Explanation:

What weaknesses in the articles of Confederation made a lasting government impossible? The Confederation Congress lacked key powers - it could not raise taxes or regulate trade. The Congress could not make states obey the laws it passed.

8 0
3 years ago
Who pays private security firms for their contribution to public safety?
melomori [17]

Answer:

Private security officers are increasingly being asked to support law enforcement and emergency personnel, as well as assist with evacuations and other emergency procedures. Many government entities, such as the DHS headquarters itself, military bases and other facilities both here and abroad, rely on private security.

The private security industry is a crucial component of security and safety in the United States and abroad. Today, private security is responsible not only for protecting many of the nation‘s institutions and critical infrastructure systems, but also for protecting intellectual property and sensitive corporate information. U.S. companies also rely heavily on private security for a wide range of functions, including protecting employees and property, conducting investigations, performing pre-employment screening, providing information technology security, and many other functions.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How does the Fourth Amendment protect individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures by the police? When are there exceptio
sammy [17]

INTERESTS PROTECTED

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from unreasonable intrusions by the government. However, the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, but only those done by the government and deemed unreasonable under the law. To claim violation of Fourth Amendment as the basis for suppressing a relevant evidence, the court had long required that the claimant must prove that he himself was the victim of an invasion of privacy to have a valid standing to claim protection under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Supreme Court has departed from such requirement, issue of exclusion is to be determined solely upon a resolution of the substantive question whether the claimant's Fourth Amendment rights have been violated, which in turn requires that the claimant demonstrates a justifiable expectation of privacy, which was arbitrarily violated by the government. In general, most warrantless searches of private premises are prohibited under the Fourth Amendment, unless specific exception applies. For instance, a warrantless search may be lawful, if an officer has asked and is given consent to search; if the search is incident to a lawful arrest; if there is probable cause to search and there is exigent circumstance calling for the warrantless search. Exigent circumstances exist in situations where a situation where people are in imminent danger, where evidence faces imminent destruction, or prior to a suspect's imminent escape. On the other hand, warrantless search and seizure of properties are not illegal, if the objects being searched are in plain view. Further, warrantless seizure of abandoned property, or of properties on an open field do not violate Fourth Amendment, because it is considered that having expectation of privacy right to an abandoned property or to properties on an open field is not reasonable. However, in some states, there are some exception to this limitation, where some state authorities have granted protection to open fields. States can always establish higher standards for searches and seizures protection than what is required by the Fourth Amendment, but states cannot allow conducts that violate the Fourth Amendment. Where there was a violation of one’s fourth amendment rights by federal officials, A bivens action can be filed against federal law enforcement officials for damages, resulting from an unlawful search and seizure. Under the Bivens action, the claimant needs to prove that there has been a constitutional violation of the fourth amendment rights by federal officials acting under the color of law. However, the protection under the Fourth Amendment can be waived if one voluntarily consents to or does not object to evidence collected during a warrantless search or seizure.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provi
    12·2 answers
  • The attempt to ratify the equal rights amendment was an important struggle for
    15·1 answer
  • What did the chickne crass the road
    15·2 answers
  • Because the U.S. Constitution is vague or silent about many of the roles of state and local governments, many of the complex rel
    13·1 answer
  • Help please!! This is timed
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following individual is NOT considered a U.S. citizen?
    12·1 answer
  • Explain the importance of the law. please like 10 points. please help.​
    15·2 answers
  • Who should you contact if you have trouble making payments.
    8·1 answer
  • What would the most difficult part of being a peace officer would be?
    13·1 answer
  • Please help me??
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!