1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aniked [119]
3 years ago
6

4(p-7)=44I wrote this question can you answer it ​

Mathematics
2 answers:
Keith_Richards [23]3 years ago
8 0

103.25

Step-by-step explanation:

rewrite

4p - 28 = 441

-28. -28

----- -----

0. 413

413÷4= 103.25

pav-90 [236]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

p=117.25

Step-by-step explanation:

441/4=110.25

110.25+7=117.25

You might be interested in
What would you have to do to change 10 cubic feet into cubic inches? A. Multiply by 46,656 B. Divide by 1,728 C. Multiply by 1,7
Semmy [17]
1 foot = 12 inches

(1 foot)³ = (12 inches)³

12³ = 1,728 in³

To change 10 cubic feet into cubic inches

10 ft³ * 1728 in³/ft³ = 17,280 in³  Choice C. Multiply by 1,728
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Mike saves $42 a week for 7 weeks. During his 8-day vacation, he plans to spend $8.25 each day for snacks. Which expression show
Alla [95]
The answer is B, because you will have to multiple 42 by 7 to see how much money he will have in 7 weeks and then you will have to subtract 8 × 8.25 to see how much money he spent on his vacation.
5 0
3 years ago
The hours of daylight, y, in Utica in days x from January 1, 2013 can be modeled by the equation y = 2.89sin(0.0145x-1.40) + 10.
Pie

Answer:

9.3 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

y = 2.89\sin(0.0145x-1.40) + 10.99.

Required

Hours of sunlight on Feb 21, 2013

First, calculate the number of days from Jan 1, 2013 to Feb 21, 2013

days = 52

So:

x = 52

So, we have:

y = 2.89\sin(0.0145x-1.40) + 10.99.

y = 2.89\sin(0.0145*52-1.40) + 10.99.

y = 2.89\sin(0.754-1.40) + 10.99.

y = 2.89\sin(-0.646) + 10.99.

y = 2.89*-0.6020 + 10.99.

y = -1.740 + 10.99.

y = 9.25

<em></em>y = 9.3<em> --- approximated</em>

8 0
3 years ago
What are the x and y values....?<br><br> -1x + 2y = 18 <br><br> Haylp me pls!
Nesterboy [21]
Use the zeroes to figure this out... x=-18, y=9
7 0
3 years ago
A manufacturer uses production method to produce steel rods. A random sample of 17 steel rods resulted in lengths with a standar
Arisa [49]

Answer:

\chi^2 =\frac{17-1}{12.15} 22.09 =15.87

Traditional method

We can find a critical value in the chi square distribution with df =16 who accumulates \alpha/2 =0.05 of the area on each tail and we got:

\chi^2_{crit}= 7.962

\chi^2_{crit}=26.296

Since the calculated value is between the two critical values we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true deviation is NOT significantly different from 3.5 cm

Confidence level method

We can find the p value like this

p_v =2*P(\chi^2 >15.87)=0.92

Since the p value is higher then the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is NOT significantly different from 3.5 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

Data provided

n=17 represent the sample selected

\alpha=0.1 represent the significance

s^2 =4.7^2 =22.09 represent the sample variance

\sigma^2_0 =3.5^2 =12.15 represent the value to check

Null and alternative hypothesis

We want to verify if the new production method has lengths with a standard deviation different from 3.5 cm, so the system of hypothesis would be:

Null Hypothesis: \sigma^2 = 12.15

Alternative hypothesis: \sigma^2 \neq 12.15

The statistic for this case is given by:

\chi^2 =\frac{n-1}{\sigma^2_0} s^2

The degrees of freedom are:

df =n-1= 17-1=16

\chi^2 =\frac{17-1}{12.15} 22.09 =15.87

Traditional method

We can find a critical value in the chi square distribution with df =16 who accumulates \alpha/2 =0.05 of the area on each tail and we got:

\chi^2_{crit}= 7.962

\chi^2_{crit}=26.296

Since the calculated value is between the two critical values we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true deviation is significantly different from 3.5 cm

Confidence level method

We can find the p value like this

p_v =2*P(\chi^2 >15.87)=0.92

Since the p value is higher then the significance level we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we can conclude that the true deviation is significantly different from 3.5 cm

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 25-x^2/5x+x^2 lim x -5
    13·1 answer
  • Which equation below gives an incorrect value for the function k(x) = 512x?
    9·1 answer
  • Rose has a fish tank in the shape of a rectangular prism. The fish tank has a length of 20 inches and a width of 10 inches Rose
    8·1 answer
  • What is 3000000 5000 20 6 in standard form
    6·1 answer
  • 5. Which best describes the graph of y &gt;x^2 +6x+ 12?
    9·1 answer
  • Which equation matches to the graph?
    12·2 answers
  • Find the value x<br><br>please help<br><br>​
    7·1 answer
  • ∠10° is complementary to which of the following angles?
    13·2 answers
  • Write the next three multiples of 6 24 whats the other three questions
    10·2 answers
  • A product code consists of four letters followed by five digits. Only the letters X, Y, and Z can be used ( and any of the digit
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!