1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry [639]
3 years ago
9

Write a quadratic function given the vertex (2, -4) and the point (1, 3)

Mathematics
1 answer:
viva [34]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

e

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
Find the range, median, and mode of the following dot plot.
Aloiza [94]

Answer:

Range: 0.07

Median: 0.145

Mode: none

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>Range:</u> largest #- smallest #

<u>Median:</u> middle number (when numbers are in order least to greatest) or when two are middle number you add them, and divide by two

<u>Mode:</u> most occurring number(s) (if there aren't any, no mode)—but if there are multiples such as 2 zeros and 2 ones then 0 and 1 would be the mode

5 0
3 years ago
In a study of 420,095 Danish cell phone users, 135 subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:

z=\frac{0.0003214 -0.00034}{\sqrt{\frac{0.00034(1-0.00034)}{420095}}}=-0.654  

p_v =2*P(Z  

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.005 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that the true proportion not differs significantly from the specified value of 0.00034 or 0.034%.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Data given and notation  

n=420095 represent the random sample taken

X=135 represent the subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute as reported in USA Today)

\hat p=\frac{135}{420095}=0.0003214 estimated proportion of subjects developed cancer of the brain or nervous system (based on data from the Journal of the National Cancer Institute as reported in USA Today)

p_o=0.00034 is the value that we want to test

\alpha=0.005 represent the significance level

Confidence=99.5% or 0.995

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)  

2) Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the brain or nervous system at a rate that is different from the rate of 0.0340% :  

Null hypothesis:p=0.00034  

Alternative hypothesis:p \neq 0.00034  

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:  

z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}} (1)  

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion \hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value p_o.

3) Calculate the statistic  

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

z=\frac{0.0003214 -0.00034}{\sqrt{\frac{0.00034(1-0.00034)}{420095}}}=-0.654  

4) Statistical decision  

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.  

The significance level provided \alpha=0.005. The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.  

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:  

p_v =2*P(Z  

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given \alpha=0.005 we have p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can say that the true proportion not differs significantly from the specified value of 0.00034 or 0.034%.  

4 0
3 years ago
Can the sum of two mixed numbers be equal to 2, explain why or why not
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
No because a mixed number is a whole number with a fraction and the smallest whole number is one so 1 and a fraction pulse and a fraction will equal more than 2
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer choices: <br><br> 16/3<br> 40/9<br> 4/9<br> 4/3
son4ous [18]

Answer:

0.44444444 or 4/9

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we know the value of x, we can rewrite the equation replacing the variables.

\frac{2}{3}^{2} + 3*\frac{2}{3} - 2

Now solve. While solving, remember the order of operations.

\frac{2}{3}^{2} + 3*\frac{2}{3} - 2 = 0.44444444 or \frac{4}{9}

3 0
3 years ago
What is 8.5% of 70 when you multiply
tigry1 [53]
5.95 is your answer. Have a wonderful day
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • f sinx is approximately 0.2588, what is the measurement of x to the nearest degree? Approximately, what is the cosine of the ang
    9·1 answer
  • Perpendicular and angle bisector
    8·2 answers
  • Pleas answer it in two minutes
    14·1 answer
  • Cw 11.1 backside v. V.
    15·1 answer
  • Using complete sentences, explain the key features of the graph of the sine function.
    7·1 answer
  • How would I do this please help.
    6·1 answer
  • Find the x-intercept(s) and the coordinates of the vertex for the parabola.
    6·1 answer
  • What is the slope of the following line?<br><br> y-7=(x+2)
    13·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP! I AM VERY CONFUSED
    6·1 answer
  • Divide.<br><br> 51.75 ÷ 15<br><br><br> 3.45<br><br> 34.5<br><br> 345<br><br> I don't know.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!