Based on the calculations, the pressure inside this droplet is equal to 2,909.35 kPa.
<u>Given the following data:</u>
- Surface tension = 0.00518 lbf/ft to N/m = 0.00702 N/m.
- Atmospheric pressure = 14.7psia to kPa = 101.35 kPa.
- Diameter = 0.01 mm to m = 0.00001 m.
Radius, r = 
= 0.000005 m.
<h3>How to determine the pressure inside a droplet.</h3>
For a droplet with only one surface, its pressure is given by this formula:
Substituting the given parameters into the formula, we have;
Inside pressure = 2,909.35 kPa.
Read more on pressure here: brainly.com/question/24827501
Answer:
- No, the points are evenly distributed about the x-axis.
Explanation:
<u>1. Write the table with the data:</u>
x given predicted residual
1 - 3.5 - 1.1
2 - 2.9 2
3 - 1.1 5.1
4 2.2 8.2
5 3.4 1.3
<u>2. Complete the column of residuals</u>
The residual is the observed (given) value - the predicted value.
- residual = given - predicted.
Thus, the complete table, with the residual values are:
x given predicted residual
1 - 3.5 - 1.1 - 2.4
2 - 2.9 2 - 4.9
3 - 1.1 5.1 - 6.2
4 2.2 8.2 - 6.0
5 3.4 1.3 2.1
<u>3. Residual plot</u>
You must plot the last column:
x residual
1 - 2.4
2 - 4.9
3 - 6.2
4 - 6.0
5 2.1
See the plot attached.
<em>Does the residual plot show that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data?</em>
Ideally, a residual plot for a line of best fit that is appropiate for the data must not show any pattern; the points should be randomly distributed about the x-axis.
But the points of the plot are not randomly distributed about the x-axis: there are 4 points below the x-axis and 1 point over the x-axis: there are more negative residuals than positive residuals. This is a pattern. Also, you could say that they show a curve pattern, which drives to the same conclusion: the residual plot shows that the line of best fit is not appropiate for the data.
Thus, the conclusion should be: No, the points have a pattern.
- 1. "<em>Yes, the points have no pattern</em>": false, because as shown, the points do have a pattern, which makes the residual plots does not show that the line of best fit is appropiate for the data.
- 2. "<em>No, the points are evenly distributed about the x-axis</em>": true. As already said the points have a pattern. It is a curved pattern, and this <em>shows the line of best fit is not appropiate for the data.</em>
- 3. "<em>No, the points are in a linear pattern</em>": false. The points are not in a linear pattern.
- 4. "<em>Yes, the points are in a curved pattern</em>": false. Because the points are in a curved pattern, the residual plot shows that the line of best fit is not appropiate for the data.
Answer:
I mean rubber protects you
One of the disadvantages of watching the scene rather than reading it is the difficulty in interpreting the movements in the absence of stage directions.
<h3>What are stage directions?</h3>
- They are instructions.
- Show how actors must express their characters through movements and behaviors.
- They show how the scenario should be set.
The stage directions shown in the text above show how actors should move through stage directions. This is shown in detail and specifies that it can be missed if the scene is watched and not read.
More information on stage directions is at the link:
brainly.com/question/404162
Yes their is, some people can be hands on learning, or they may use the style of someone telling them how to do it. Theirs also reading to learn. Some other styles as well.
