Answer:
How are the cases similar to each other? In other words, why would the earlier case be a precedent in the decision for the other?
What are the main arguments for each side in the Vernonia v. Acton case? What details does each side use to support their opinion?
Which side in the Vernonia v. Acton case had the stronger argument and why? (It's okay to choose either side. You will not be graded on your opinion, but rather on how well you support it with facts. Remember that even Supreme Court justices do not always agree!) pls keep it organized
Explanation:
Answer:
This is called an Arraignment;
Explanation:
This is where a bail, the defendant stating if he is innocent or Guilty, etc. This is where the constitutional right to understand your charges you're being faced with, you're accuser, ultimately a Judge would be set, for the case.
Answer: Hi I hope that helps!
Explanation: You might have to pay late fees. Depending on how long it has been expired. But that is all I know. I think that should help a little bit I hope that helps you it may not be all you were looking for but I think you will need that.
Have a good day/night
Answer:
d
Explanation:
d) I believe First Degree Felony
Answer:
Throughout the explanation portion, the summary of the question is described.
Explanation:
- Throughout the case for the sake of an approach made by one party or a third party accepting the position, the contractual relationship however is legitimate if somehow the legal conditions as well as agreed upon by both candidates are legitimate.
- It must thus be considered if the acknowledgment by emptiness or mute was applicable. This then states that perhaps the proposition can be canceled at any moment until the confirmation correspondence even against the person in question would be concluded.
Although once approval has been notified to that same offeror, it would not be feasible to immediately terminate the offering.