Answer:
A good place for reviewers to start is with:
<u>A. an analysis of the work's context</u>.
Explanation:
The work of a reviewer can become really strenuous when the work is too extensive or complex, so an ideal first step is to do a context analysis, that is, not to focus directly on the object of the work but <u>everything that led to its creation, as its historical, social, political or academic base, and all that it would involve, which can give you a general idea of the work,</u> which you will surely use later as prior knowledge to objectively analyze the works without making mistakes like misinterpretations.