Kelley writes the expression n + 2 to model the phrase “Xander studied two more hours than Nandini.” Which best explains the acc
uracy of Kelley’s expression? It is accurate. In the phrase “two more hours than Nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more” is “+,” and Nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2 + n or n + 2 are correct translations. It is inaccurate. In the phrase “two more hours than Nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more” is “+,” and Nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2 + n is the correct translation. It is inaccurate. In the phrase “two more hours than Nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more than” is “>,” and Nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2 greater-than n is the correct translation. It is inaccurate. In the phrase “two more hours than Nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more than” is “<,” and Nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2 less-than n is the correct translation.
