Answer:
<em>C. The US had a military base at Guantanamo Bay. </em>
<em>D. The US had many economic interests in Cuba</em>.
Explanation:
It's not A because let's be honest, that's a very dum answer
It's not B because that's an even more dum answer
So since there is more than one answer, it would be both C and D.
C because the US till this day has a military base in Cuba called Guantanamo Bay, where they send criminals.
D because Cuba was like "America's Playground" as it was controlled by them prior to their independence. Considering how close it was, it would be a good trading point.
Hope this helped m8!
<em>Letter B </em>is correct. Oliver Cromwell was indeed a Calvinist protector of the Puritans in England, but he did not command any closure of theaters or Christmas banishment.
<em>Letter A and C: </em>Although John Locke is considered to be the 'father' of the Enlightenment. Empiricist and representative of the Liberal Individualism, he argued that sovereignty should not belong to the State, but to the people.
Although he was the first to propose the government powers separation in England, Charles Montesquieu (one of the most important representatives of the Enlightenment movement in France, along with Voltarie and Rousseau) also proposed that the power should be divided among Executive, Legislative and Judiciary.
<em>Letter D</em>: Benjamin Franklin, inventor, writer, philosopher, diplomat and one of the signatures under the U.S. Declaration of independence, was also fond of the Enlightenment ideals. Known as the greatest diplomat in the history of America, he was as popular as Voltaire in XVIII Century Enlightened France, what made him able to convince the French Monarchy to aid their cause against the Great Britain domain, towards the independence consolidation. Among his many deeds after inaugurating democracy in U.S., he engaged in several community-oriented projects, including the creation of libraries and universities for the population.
The correct answer is D) Great Britain and Europe
Provide integration services as soon as possible for those asylum seekers most likely to be allowed to stay
Time spent waiting around can damage refugees’ chances of integrating, yet they often have to wait months or even years before receiving language training and other integration support, such as skills assessments and civic integration courses. Countries should both shorten the time it takes to assess asylum applications and provide early support to those most likely to stay. Norway provides a good example in offering up to 250 hours of language training for asylum seekers in reception centers.
hope this helps
Who? You didn’t give a name of who you are talking about
