Answer: it is not a run-on sentence.
Explanation:
The above sentence has two independent clauses which are joined together with a conjunction.
Answer:
A). Paying attention to what the negative is saying.
B). Identifying important pieces of evidence that the negative uses.
E). Thinking about a possible counterclaim.
Explanation:
As per the question, when the negative or opponent is presenting claim with along with the evidence one is required to <u>'pay complete attention to what he/she says'</u> as it would help in preparing the counterclaim accordingly and more efficiently to rebut or neglect his ideas. Then, <u>'Identification of important pieces of evidence that the negative uses'</u> as it help produce sufficient rebuttal evidence to counter it efficiently. Next, would be <u>'Thinking about a possible counterclaim'</u> to deny his claim and establish the credibility of his claim. Thus, <u>options A, B, and E</u> are the correct answers.
Answer:
A) Peat
Explanation:
peat is dead plants that accumulates in swamp areas.
<span>Lawrence Ferlinghetti is a poet from the 1950's. The poem refered to in this case is "To the Oracle at Delphi" The lines given to examine are "1)Why are you staring at me now
2)as if I were America itself the new Empire 3)vaster than any in ancient days 4)carrying its corporate monoculture 5)And tell us how to save us from ourselves 6) who would make a plutocracy of our democracy 7)between the rich and the poor" The line that show his view of modern society in America is line 6. </span>
