As a judge, i would rule in favor if Bakilana
By confiscating her password and forcing her to work for long hours, Bakilana had cause intentional infliction of emotional distress toward kiwanuka.
Bakilana has intentionally inflicted emotional distress to Kiwanuka by taking extreme/outrageous conduct such as taking her passwords and mentally abuse Kiwanuka.
But, that's being said, Kiwanuka does not present any proof about her accusation. (recording or witnesses). If Kiwanuka provide them, as a judge I will rule in favour of her. But since there is still a reasonable doubt that the accusation is false, i would rule in favor of Bakilana.
It is risky to invest in a commodity because: <span>The commodity's price might drop significantly very quicklly
</span>Commodity products are circulated really quickly. This will affect the rarity of the product in the markets. If the rarity is high, the price will increase and vice versa. This exact condition makes the price for that commodity also fluctuated really quickly.
The question of whether Sterling Cooper and Co.’s <em>application process </em>is problematic under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act is:
- A. No, Sterling Cooper and Co.’s application process likely does not raise concerns Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
<h3>Title VII of the Civil Rights Act</h3>
This refers to the clause within the Civil Rights Act which prohibits employers from discriminating prospective workers on the grounds of their race, color, religion, gender or country.
With this in mind, we can see that Sterling Cooper and Co made use of an application process which had to do with checking if the prospective employee has been convicted of a felony. This does not violate the Civil Rights Act Title VII in any way.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A
Read more about Civil Rights Act here:
brainly.com/question/10584148
Answer:
elections become more democratic
Explanation:
