NOTE: Your question isn't clear, Johnson. Would you mind checking it and writing it in a way you can be better helped?
Meanwhile, I hope these explanation below helps.
Answer and Explanation:
Two goods are said to be complementary goods if an increase in the price of a particular one leads to a commensurate decrease in the demand that buyers placed for the other one.
A good is said to be a normal good if the reason for an increase in demand is due to an increase in the income of the buyers.
A good is said to be an inferior good if there is a decrease in demand even though the buyers have experienced increase in their income.
I shall replace the salesman after discovering that a salesman is receiving kickbacks from my largest customer, analog concerns.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the above mentioned scenario, the salesman is given a kickbacks - "advantages" for either the good relationship that they have maintained with the client or for luring them to always provide them the product/service with discounts.
So in this situation I would obviously replace the salesman because such situations cannot be ignored and there is no assurance that the salesman will not take kickbacks henceforth. And asking for a cut is ethically wrong as the salesman getting the kickbacks.
Answer:
En economía, se habla de teorías del valor para indicar el conjunto de concepciones sobre la génesis y determinación del valor, como propiedad de las mercancías distinta del costo y lógicamente antecedente al precio, que constituye su manifestación fenomenal en esta perspectiva.
La economía política siempre ha tratado de responder a la pregunta: ¿de dónde viene el valor? Las respuestas fueron muy divergentes. Van desde la escasez de bienes disponibles, a su utilidad, a la necesidad de remunerar los factores productivos, incluido el capital y considerando su remuneración; - el beneficio - como recompensa por la abstinencia del capitalista, que puede permitirse renunciar al consumo para utilizar la propia riqueza de forma productiva, etc.
Answer:
Correct one is Option D.
<u>$6,500</u>
Explanation:
Fair value of its 20% interest in the receivables 8000
Less: Factoring fee=50000*3%
=1500
Amount receivable from factor= 8000-1500=6500
False.
The business owner should not only rely on his best judgement to determine projected costs and revenues. He should consider the trends in the market and his company performance on the previous months in order to make a sales forecast.
