1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vesna [10]
3 years ago
7

Did Ladd think in actions of these voters were legal? Explain your answer

History
1 answer:
lana66690 [7]3 years ago
4 0
"Erastus D. Ladd is known for his "Description of the Lawrence Massacre" did not think that what these voters did were legal. They murdered a lot of people and ruined  a town that was supposed to be Ladd's home. In the account, there were 240 orphans and 85 widows because of the massacre. "
You might be interested in
How did political parties affect the results of the election of 1796? Need Help ASAP
nevsk [136]
There was a split Government with a federalist president and democratic republic Vice President
3 0
3 years ago
Who celebrates thanksgiving the second monday in november
Arisa [49]
I don't
Explain: I live in America so I celebrate it on the 25th this year
8 0
3 years ago
Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
Lerok [7]

Answer:

Chiaroscuro

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Cuales fueron los factores internos y externos que condicionaron el proceso que llevó a la independencia de las Provincias Unida
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer: El detonante inmediato del conflicto fue la invasión de Napoleón a la Península Ibérica (España y Portugal) en 1807 y 1808, pero sus raíces también se encuentran en el creciente descontento de las élites criollas (personas de ascendencia española que habían nacido en América Latina) con el restricciones impuestas por el dominio imperial español.

Explanation:

Lo siento si mi español no estaba claro, todavía estoy trabajando en ello. ¡Espero que esto ayude!  

7 0
3 years ago
Can the government take private property from an individual?
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
The Taking of Property for Public Use. Eminent domain is the power of government to take private land for public use. This power is limited by the federal Constitution and by state constitutions -- when the government does take private property for public use, it must fairly compensate the owner for the deprivation. So no they can unless they have the owners permission :)
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • History of voting rights in the 1960s
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the united states get involved in the korean war? what was the outcome of the war?
    13·2 answers
  • Why do you think that tertiary and quaternary periods have greater resolution in their subdivisions (epochs) than the periods co
    7·1 answer
  • Why do you think there was record turnout of voters for the 2008 election? (5 points)
    10·2 answers
  • How would the world be different if the Columbian Exchange never happened?
    8·2 answers
  • Give an example of government engaging in public discrimination
    10·1 answer
  • Pls help me aslo don’t report me I’ll mark brainliesy too sorry wisebord
    11·1 answer
  • Who held claims(4 countries) to the Oregon Country?
    13·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP! For the Plymouth settlers, "thanksgiving" referred to a day of:
    8·1 answer
  • What does it reveal about the median age for marriage in the united states between 1947 and 1981?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!