Answer: I would actually disagree on this
Explanation: In America there was a time period where conscientious objectors were ordered by the government to vote. However, their denial to vote brought them severe prison time, torture and opposition. If 16 year olds could vote then people with religious beliefs or who are conscientious objectors would be bullied by political peers and such pressure could obligate them to go against their conscious and norms. From ages 16 to 18 a person is too young to commit the right decisions without a person actually influencing them. A person is capable of thinking for themselves without outward influences when they are about 21 and up. Also, voting is not necessary, it’s simple tradition. It’s a superficial thing, people think they choose the president but in reality it’s the Supreme Court who makes that decision for you. You could fact check that if you attend a civics class or if you directly ask a representative from congress.
B is the correct answer because this company allowed illegal means in order to increase profits.
A. Moral examples are totally ignored.
C. By ignoring safety precautions, this company is not focusing in public welfare.
D. Their resolution shows that it is unlikely this company shares its profits fairly.
E. It's plainly shown that this Business doesn't employ only legal means to earn profits.
Answer:
It's very beautiful and passionate!
Tips:
-you put "once you get to the top" twice so try changing or deleting the second one.
-some common grammar mistakes (capitalize, correct spots for commas/periods, etc).
-try not to use "etc" in your writing.
-you spelled "realize" as relies
Other than those the story was good!! :)
The answer is “who” referring to one person
