No one, not even he could have averted the war without a historical wrong that could no longer be justified in a democracy - the continuation of legal human bondage in the United States. But to answer the question. Yes, I think it was very possible that no guns had to fire, and it would have been to me a revolting development.
a) the fertile soil led to food surpluses, which supported a larger group of people
During wwii, for the most part, everyone was united. we were all fighting for one cause. after wwii, america has sealed its fate as a global presence. we took on a leadership role of sorts in the playing field. then, the cold war happened (to sum it up, america and russia were not very happy with each other). when the cold war came about, things like the space race showed up too (first to go to space, first to land on the moon, etc). there were so many goals that each nation was working towards to make itself better, to make itself known, and to make sure they were a force to reckon with. in order to do that, you had to have people that were willing to do that. more people wanted their country to become a superpower, or launch people into space, or have the best weapons. people wanted to be proud of their country. hopefully that helps you :D
In many ways, the encomienda system resembled a feudal system: The Spanish monarchy granted conquistadors, soldiers, and other officials control over a specific number of Indians, and later Africans, as well as the lands on which those Indians lived.
Answer:
B. It represents the main route for settlers moving into the Oregon Territory.
Explanation:
i believe that B is your best answer, as it looks like it is showing the Oregon trail, which led from Independence to Oregon.
