The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.
A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
It treated them badly cause it took their land and made them relocate to a diffrent area
Well, the correct answer for the first question is going to be A) True. This is because back in 1605 to the year of 1675 he had become the first Proprietor and Proprietary Governor of province of Maryland. But he became the 2nd<span> of the colony of Province of Avalon.
The answer for question two is going to be D) South Carolina. I would explain this one but it would take me to long.
I hope this helped!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest</span>
Westward expansion began with the Louisiana Purchase, (it was a movement of settlers into the American West.)
Jerusalem has been considered a holy city mostly by Jews, Christians, and Muslims--which is why it is one of the most contested and fought-over pieces of land in the world.
