It would be the accumulation of assets and Liabilities would be the equal to the amount of Dante's capital.
For example, Let's say we know that Dante has $150,000 in capital and $ 50,000 in liabilities.
Dante's asset would be:
$150,000 - $ 50,000 = $100,000
which mean <span>He has $50,000 more in assets than in liabilities</span>
This political involvement would likely be based on <u>"self-interest".</u>
The significance of self-interest at both the small scale and large scale levels of politics turns out to be clear once one looks not just at the "contributions" of a majority rules system but rather at its "yields" too. The commonness of intrigue gatherings, the brokenness of the United States impose code, the campaigning by associations for their individuals' self-interest, the reserves in the Patriot Act, the various instances of debasement in Western popular governments, and the disappointment of natives with their legislatures' failings all point to the significance of self-interest in politics.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
did it on edge Brainliest pls.
Answer:
social learning
Explanation:
Social learning is perhaps the best way to effectively learn simply by observing other people and noticing their experiences. Since we can see consequences of behaviours it tends to teach us important lessons in life.
Another way is when children are growing they start to imitate and learn by observing others, then model a role. This enables them to gather an amazing amount of information present in the environment in a very short time-lapse. Also, the evolutionists believe that humans have evolved in part because we can learn socially and culturally, making thing from the past still be present today since we first adapted to Earth.
