1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kakasveta [241]
2 years ago
10

Que diferencias hay entre Peter Grande y Catalina Grande

History
1 answer:
jonny [76]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

? yo no lo se que es?

Explanation:

I need an explanation

You might be interested in
How did the French and Indian War lead to tensions between England and its<br> colonies?
Lilit [14]

Answer:

Your answer is here but you have to mark it as brainliest answer as it will also give you 3 points

Explanation:

The French and Indian War was the North American conflict in a larger imperial war between Great Britain and France known as the Seven Years’ War. The French and Indian War began in 1754 and ended with the Treaty of Paris in 1763. The war provided Great Britain enormous territorial gains in North America, but disputes over subsequent frontier policy and paying the war’s expenses led to colonial discontent, and ultimately to the American Revolution.

Map from the French and Indian War

The French and Indian War resulted from ongoing frontier tensions in North America as both French and British imperial officials and colonists sought to extend each country’s sphere of influence in frontier regions. In North America, the war pitted France, French colonists, and their Native allies against Great Britain, the Anglo-American colonists, and the Iroquois Confederacy, which controlled most of upstate New York and parts of northern Pennsylvania. In 1753, prior to the outbreak of hostilities, Great Britain controlled the 13 colonies up to the Appalachian Mountains, but beyond lay New France, a very large, sparsely settled colony that stretched from Louisiana through the Mississippi Valley and Great Lakes to Canada. (See Incidents Leading up to the French and Indian War and Albany Plan)

The border between French and British possessions was not well defined, and one disputed territory was the upper Ohio River valley. The French had constructed a number of forts in this region in an attempt to strengthen their claim on the territory. British colonial forces, led by Lieutenant Colonel George Washington, attempted to expel the French in 1754, but were outnumbered and defeated by the French. When news of Washington’s failure reached British Prime Minister Thomas Pelham-Holles, Duke of Newcastle, he called for a quick undeclared retaliatory strike. However, his adversaries in the Cabinet outmaneuvered him by making the plans public, thus alerting the French Government and escalating a distant frontier skirmish into a full-scale war.

8 0
3 years ago
The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as ________.
nevsk [136]

Answer:

The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as an illustration of the widespread hatred of Indians during the Age of Jackson.

Explanation:

When Jackson rose to power the situation with the American Indians was extremely tense. Just a few years before, in 1815, the country began to expand towards the west and ran into the tribes of American Indians who had inhabited the country for centuries. Those occupied lands aroused the desires of the colonies, which initiated a series of campaigns to get the Natives to travel further west in exchange for all economic royalties.

In fact, already during Jefferson's tenure (in office between 1801 and 1809) it had been established that the only natives who could stay east of the Mississippi would be those who had "civilized" and could coexist with the "white man." Based on this, those that had remained in the region were the Chicksaw, Choctaw, Creek, Seminole and Cherokee tribes. These, in exchange for maintaining their territories, had fixed their settlements, tilled the land, divided their land into private property and had adopted democracy. Some became Christian (at least in appearance) so as not to be expelled from the area.

In 1830, just one year after taking power, Jackson decided to solve the Indian problem by the brave. That is, creating a law to deport them further west. That year, the Indian Removal Act was passed, which obliged the Indians to move to lands west of the Mississippi and authorized the president of the United States to act against all those located to the east of the Mississippi river.

Officially, the politician made this decision because of the need for land to produce cotton and for "national security" (to avoid conflicts between Indians and Americans). However, in addition to these two causes and his own racism, Jackson also sought to create a human barrier between the United States and the regions under the control of other transatlantic powers. With them, Jackson not only sought to empty the Indian territories colonized west of the Mississippi Indian conflicts, but also create a security belt to the Spanish and British threat that was still installed in large North American territories.

Regardless of the cause, in practice, tens of thousands of Indians were urged to leave the houses in which they lived (their lands for centuries) to leave for "reserved" territories.

At the official level, Jackson claimed that the natives had the possibility of refusing this "relocation" and keeping their home in the United States. However, the reality was that the government (at the head of which was the president) exerted a brutal pressure on the tribal chiefs to leave. In addition, they made it clear that, in the face of the refusal, they would use force.

5 0
3 years ago
Which statements best complete the diagram of the steps in a federal criminal case
lora16 [44]

Answer:

1) A jury hears arguments during a trial. (2) The defendant may appeal the verdict.

Explanation:

<em>Many incidents are chosen for an "oral argument" ere the forum. Oral reasons in the courtyard of requests is a structured conversation amongst the appellate advocates and the committee of justices concentrating on the constitutional laws in conflict. Each side is given a small time — normally about 15 minutes — to give reasoning to the court.</em>

6 0
3 years ago
The top of the cylinder head is sealed by the
pochemuha
<span>B. valve cover. is the answer</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Where might a slave captured
sergeinik [125]
Probably the islands of the Caribbean
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • An election is being held in Licking County on Tuesday, May 8, between 6:30 a.m. and 7:30 p.m. The Pataskala Public Library need
    15·1 answer
  • Overall, were the effects of the progressivism more harmful or beneficial to American society?
    9·2 answers
  • Document signed by England giving up the America colonies and making them officially free and independent
    14·1 answer
  • Why did young women who were known as "flappers" in the 1920s often face disapproval?
    10·1 answer
  • What was a result of Germany’s involvement in the Spanish civil war
    10·1 answer
  • What was Thomas Paine's opinion about the colonies and great britain?<br> Please Help and thanks!!
    9·1 answer
  • What type of goverment does samoa have,also explain 5 different parts of culture
    8·1 answer
  • Plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz help 20 point
    10·2 answers
  • Why did the English charge Joan of Arc with heresy and witchcraft.
    6·2 answers
  • Explain how the quick victory over France impacted Hitler's authority within Germany
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!