DNA being placed with DNA polymerase and nucleotides and resulting in new copies is not an opinion or inference because the fact is, new more DNA was found in the test tube after adding the enzymes and nucleotides than before the addition. DNA sequencing of the new copies would have shown that the sequences of the new DNA are identical to the original DNA that was first placed in the test tube. Also, other experiments would have shown that adding other different kinds of molecules or enzymes does not, in fact, produce new strands of the original DNA, nor should it be able replicate the DNA at all.
I think the answer is the moon in its orbit around the Earth
Hello!
A aquifer<span> names an underground area that collects and holds a large amount of water.
I know this because an aquifer collects water.
~ Hope I helped! ~
</span>
These changes can be natural, such as through variations in the solar cycle.
<h3>Climate history</h3>
Clam shells
2. 800,000 years ago
Ice cores
1. 150 million years ago
Oldest rocks in the world
5. 3.8 billion years ago
Tree cores
3. 10,000 years ago
Ocean sediments
4. 200 million years ago
With this information we can conclude that these changes may be natural, such as through variations in the solar cycle. But since 1800, human activities have been the main driver of climate change, mainly due to the burning of fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas.
Learn more about Climate in brainly.com/question/885982
The zebra's descendence (offsprings) will not be able to produce blood <span>proteins (hypoproteinemia)
It touches the offspring and not the zebra itself because only the sex cells which gives spermatozoids or ovules) are touched.
The main symptom of hypoproteinemia is swelling of the legs, face and other parts of the body due to fluid accumulation loss of muscle mass.</span>
