He believed if he forced the Natives, there would be no 'parntership' between them.
Answer:
To begin with, Colonel John Bradstreet starts his statement off by calling the American Indians "savages", the "less useful, and "greatest villains". You can infer that Bradstreet does not like or want a relationship with the American Indians at all. In his statement he emphasizes how the Indians are defenseless, and that they are raising jealousy. I can tell that Bradstreet does not like the encounters with the Indians, nor think they are helpful people. Williams Johnson starts his statement off with saying that the colonist had the wrong idea about the Indians and that they " greatly dispised them" without even knowing their power or knowledge of these lands. He wanted a bond with the Indians that were beneficial; he also believed that the Indians had their own way of living and that they were useful.
The two perceptions are completely different. Bradstreet has a negative perception of the Indians the whole throughout the whole statement. He believes that the Indians are not a ally, but more of an enemy. Johnson on the other hand believes that the colonist hasn't gave the Indians a chance to show them their knowledge. He also believes that the Indians could be allies, and not enemy's.
Explanation:
On Edge 2020.
Answer: In Communism, citizens have the right to own private property.
Explanation: cuz it says so boom
Hey there,
The major objective was to limit the massive amounts of tea that the British East India Company was holding.
:)
The value of enslaved African American’s increased during and after the revolutionary war as they fought in the war.
They were part of the reason that America won the revolutionary war - they left their masters to risk their lives for a country that looked down upon them originally.
Hope this helps!
