Answer:
no he wasnt
Sure he removes the Royalty and all, but he never manages to do better in the ruling. He was power crazy, he kill those who disagree with him and use people to maintain his power, and all his promise for prosperity never achieved in his lives. Heck, he actually loses his first election and calls it void. He was a tyrannical ruler that are only slightly better than the old royalty, and better than Stalin who came after him.
He is not exactly the best example of a hero is. He is more of an idealist, and not cut out as a ruler, and he should never have come into power. Maybe as revolutioner, he is good and all but the person who should come into power should have been someone else.
Issues began to arise that caused people to divide which eventually lead to political parties i.e Democrats, Republicans, Third Parties.
It also helped with voting processes and gave our government a more defined system.
<span>Vietnam was a colony attempting to gain independence.
The conflict began as an independence movement of the Vietnamese against the French who held Vietnam as a colony since 1887.
France declared Vietnam's independence in 1954 but the US and the West wanted to keep control of the resources and area of Vietnam. US involvement was an attempt to keep Vietnam on the side of the West instead of becoming a Communist country as they were moving toward. </span>
Japan and China reacted differently to pressure from the West in the 19th century with the West and modernized successfully, neither of which China did. to stand up to the Western nations, and eventually both had to sign unequal
