1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ElenaW [278]
3 years ago
9

Which set is closed under subtraction?

Mathematics
1 answer:
siniylev [52]3 years ago
7 0
Third one is correct
You might be interested in
Someone please help me ASAP please anyone I need help now
irinina [24]
(2165-59)/3=
.............
8 0
2 years ago
To join the game club, you must pay $7 a month plus
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer: Total cost/month = 7 + 3x

Step-by-step explanation:

This is only the total cost per month that is why it is only 7 and 3x since the number of downloaded games is not given.

I'm not sure about my answer but I hope that it helps.

8 0
1 year ago
A river discharges 4 × 106 cubic feet of water into the Pacific Ocean each second. There are 86,400 seconds in one day. To find
erik [133]

Answer:

3.456E + 14= 3.456X10^{14

Step-by-step explanation:

The river discharges 4X10^6 cubic feet of water into the Pacific Ocean each second.

There are 86,400 seconds in one day.

Amount of water discharges each day

=4X10^6X86400\\=345600000000\\=3.456X10^{11

Since this differs from what you have, I will explain the scientific notation.

3.456E + 14 simply means 3.456X10^{14

The options are not well laid out but you can pick the appropriate option.

8 0
3 years ago
Hye Lim drank 4/3 gallons of water in 11/2 hours. At this rate, how long will it take her to drink 4 gallons of water?
snow_lady [41]

Answer:

16.5 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

Here is the explanation. As Hye drinks 4/3 gallons of water in 11/2 hours, we have a constant rate. There are 12 thirds in 4, so we are trying to find how long it takes Hye to drink 12/3 gallon. In this case, 4/3x3=12/3, so we multiply 11/2 by 3 as well, which gives us 33/2 hours. 33/2 in decimal form is 16.5 hours. Hope it helps!

3 0
2 years ago
Explain how the difference of a fraction or a rational number and its additive inverse is equal to zero.
Jobisdone [24]
This question is in reverse (in two ways): 

<span>1. The definition of an additive inverse of a number is precisely that which, when added to the number, will give a sum of zero. </span>

<span>The real problem, in certain fields, is usually to show that for all numbers in that field, there exists an additive inverse. </span>

<span>Therefore, if you tell me that you have a number, and its additive inverse, and you plan to add them together, then I can tell you in advance that the sum MUST be zero. </span>

<span>2. In your question, you use the word "difference", which does not work (unless the number is zero - 0 is an integer AND a rational number, and its additive inverse is -0 which is the same as 0 - the difference would be 0 - -0 = 0). </span>

<span>For example, given the number 3, and its additive inverse -3, if you add them, you get zero: </span>
<span>3 + (-3) = 0 </span>

<span>However, their "difference" will be 6 (or -6, depending which way you do the difference): </span>

<span>3 - (-3) = 6 </span>
<span>-3 - 3 = -6 </span>

<span>(because -3 is a number in the integers, then it has an additive inverse, also in the integers, of +3). </span>

<span>--- </span>

<span>A rational number is simply a number that can be expressed as the "ratio" of two integers. For example, the number 4/7 is the ratio of "four to seven". </span>

<span>It can be written as an endless decimal expansion </span>
<span>0.571428571428571428....(forever), but that does not change its nature, because it CAN be written as a ratio, it is "rational". </span>

<span>Integers are rational numbers as well (because you can always write 3/1, the ratio of 3 to 1, to express the integer we call "3") </span>

<span>The additive inverse of a rational number, written as a ratio, is found by simply flipping the sign of the numerator (top) </span>

<span>The additive inverse of 4/7 is -4/7 </span>

<span>and if you ADD those two numbers together, you get zero (as per the definition of "additive inverse") </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>If you need to "prove" it, you begin by the existence of additive inverses in the integers. </span>
<span>ALL integers each have an additive inverse. </span>
<span>For example, the additive inverse of 4 is -4 </span>

<span>Next, show that this (in the integers) can be applied to the rationals in this manner: </span>

<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = ? </span>
<span>common denominator, therefore you can factor out the denominator: </span>

<span>(4 + -4)/7 = ? </span>
<span>Inside the bracket is the sum of an integer with its additive inverse, therefore the sum is zero </span>
<span>(0)/7 = 0/7 = 0 </span>

<span>Since this is true for ALL integers, then it must also be true for ALL rational numbers.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • At Sam’s Swimming Pool Cleaning, Sam charges each of his 85 customers $25 per week for 52 weeks of service every year. Since poo
    14·1 answer
  • Z2=49 what are the solution?
    5·2 answers
  • The salsa recipe uses green pepper, onion and tomato in the extended ration 3:7:11. How many green peppers are needed to make 18
    10·2 answers
  • Rename, 1/2 and 1/3 so that the denominators of the renamed fractions ar
    7·2 answers
  • Please answer this teachers
    6·1 answer
  • 4+2y&lt;18 help please
    13·1 answer
  • Please help me on this now.​
    9·1 answer
  • $<br> 20,524,945,000,000 rounded to the nearest billion
    10·1 answer
  • Do anybody know the answer to dis
    7·1 answer
  • What is 4 percent of 92
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!