You would start at 2 and go down 4 and left 1
Answer:
The radius is approximately 2 93
The probability is 0.3, or 30%.
These are not independent events; one pill being chosen will affect the probability after that, as the pill will not be replaced before selecting the next one.
The probability of getting exactly 1 narcotic pill is given by:
(6/15)(9/14)(8/13) = 432/2730. It does not matter what order the narcotic pill is in, the overall product will be the same.
The probability of getting exactly 2 narcotic pills is given by:
(6/15)(5/14)(9/13) = 270/2730. Again, the order these are found in does not matter, as it is multiplication and will not change the product.
The probability of all 3 pills being narcotics is given by:
(6/15)(5/14)(4/13) = 120/2730.
Adding these three possibilities together, we have 822/2730 = 0.30.
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that union membership increased.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 400
p = 12.5% = 0.125
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of women belonging to union , x = 52
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
The null hypothesis sates that 12.5% of U.S. workers belong to union and the alternate hypothesis states that there is a increase in union membership.
This is a one-tailed(right) test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.3812
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that union membership increased.
Answer:
a
Step-by-step explanation: