Like the previous person said, the belgium actions in the congo are considered atrocities, not genocides. although king leopold did kill many of the natives, people debate whether it should be considered a “genocide”. it’s more appropriate to label it as an atrocity than a genocide.
The Japanese were considered spies and traitors to the Americans so the government took them from their homes and put them in internment camps they're not called concentration camps don't mix it up with nazi germany
People like Southern Democrats, Conservative Republicans, and corporate leaders didn't like the New Deal because it opposed the idea of a laissez-faire philosophy to govt. Southern Conservatives didn't favor the deal because they feared that the Jim Crow Laws of their region were threatened and corporate leaders and Republican Conservatives did not want the govt. to become anti-laissez-faire. Many Conservatives thought that the deal would go on to introduce acts like the Social Security Act that would allow people to become lazy as in some cases people use the govt. However, for the Second New Deal, FDR campaigned himself as an "ordinary working-class American" which republicans (critics) favored. FDR has stated that he though direct payments to the poor were "a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit." -- Republicans agreed with that, too.
Answer:
true, but not quite.
Explanation:
Truman did not seek to wage war or assert dominance on Japan. His original intention was to basically crippled Japan's ability to make war. So did not meant to cause that much damage, but he did.
Also, the B-29 American atomic bomb carrier, the one dropped on Hiroshima. Was named ENOLA GAY, nice, isn't it.
