Answer:
When Howard Zinn showed us that America did nothing to stop the development of fascism in Italy and Spain, he shows us that the American government of the time was not against fascism as a political movement, but specifically against abuse and racial violence carried out by the Nazis in Germany and Europe.
Explanation:
Howard Zinn was an American historian of Jewish origin, who through his works tried to explain the origins of the authoritarian movements in Europe and the American participation in World War II.
Through his theory, Zinn explains that America and the politicians of the time did not see the fascist movement as a danger or an enemy, understood as a corporatist, personalist, nationalist and socialist government. That is to say, they did not see said political organization as a danger, unlike what happened with communism, which they did identify as an imminent evil. Now, as soon as the question in Germany turned into violence against ethnic and cultural minorities, America began to take measures against these groups, no longer based on their political organization but on the racist and criminal violence of their acts.
They claimed that their wars were defensive. Whenever they attacked they would claim that the Natives had committed a transgression or had attacked first or were a threat or anything similar. This enabled them to do terrible things and still look like heroes in the eyes of the public.
<span />
Answer:
The Scramble for Africa, also called the Partition of Africa or the Conquest of Africa, was <u>the invasion, occupation, division, and colonisation of African territory by European powers during a short period known to historians as the New Imperialism</u> (between 1881 and 1914). In 1870, <u>only 10 percent of Africa was under formal European control</u>; by 1914 <em>this had increased to almost 90 percent of the continent</em>, with only Ethiopia (Abyssinia), the Dervish state (a portion of present-day Somalia) and Liberia remaining independent. <u>The European colonialists had several motives</u>:<em> a desire for valuable natural resources, the quest for national prestige, rivalry between European powers, and religious missionary zeal</em>. Internal African native politics also played a role.
Explanation:
The scramble for Africa <u>represents the most thorough and systematic process of colonialism in world history</u>.
~ The European colonial powers managed to conquer and control almost the entire continent of Africa in a short, twenty-five year period from about 1875 to 1900.
~ Some of the European states involved were already well-established global powers; the others were up and coming nations that desired to emulate and compete with the dominant imperial states.
The correct ones to the question are #1, #4, #5, #6
I think you should learn some history about African Americans and go deep in our culture with it….. but here’s some information “ when Abraham Lincoln signed the bill that Africans Americans was free, we still was getting treated like slaves . We couldn’t provide for ourselves cause the white Americans didn’t want us with benefits. Africans Americans had to leave the south and more to the west to start a better left . During that time the segregation laws was a thing .”
