Answer:
The most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Explanation:
When there isn't a statute, the buyer bears the risk of loss when property subject to a contract for sale is destroyed without fault of any party prior to the date specified for closing. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the buyer must pay the contract price even if the property is damaged by fire.
The inn was burned down in this case after the landowner and the buyer signed a contract for the sale of the property, but before the closing date. The contract appears to be silent on the risk of loss, and no appropriate statute exists. As a result of the common law rule, the buyer bears the risk of loss. Therefore, the landowner has the right to particular execution of the contract, which implies that the entire stipulated contract price must be paid by the buyer.
Regardless of the property's drop in worth owing to the fire, the $1 million contract price must be paid by the buyer because he bears the risk of loss.
Therefore, the most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
The value of the subject land is $84,000.
Given,
75,000 / 250,000 = 0.30
280,000 * 0.30 = 84,000
Land value is the measure of the way lots a plot of land is worth, now not counting any buildings but including improvements inclusive of better drainage. when a landowner can pay taxes on her actual property, a part of what is taxed is the fee of the land, in addition to whatever structures sit down atop it.
To measure the price of land use the traditional value approach: Use RS means statistics on prices to calculate the fee of the belongings as though it has been new. Subtract depreciation. The result is an estimate of the fee of the modern structure. Subtract from sale fee to get land cost.
<em />
<em>Your question is incomplete. Please read below to find the missing content.</em>
The subject property has a total value of $280,000 by the sales comparison approach. A competitive neighborhood nearby has home sales with a median value of $250,000, and recent lot sales at $75,000. By allocation, what would be the value of the subject land?
$68,000
$76,000
$84,000
$92,500
Learn more about statistics here: brainly.com/question/4219149
#SPJ4
Answer:
very few hierarchical levels
Explanation:
According to my research on different company organizational structures, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Herman Miller is most likely an organization that has very few hierarchical levels. This is since it is mentioned that the employees are placed in teams that are not higher or lower in rank from one another, but at the same time there is still a boss of the company. Therefore there are hierarchical levels but they are extremely few.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Find in the excel file attached detailed adjusting entries required for all transactions in the question.
Explanation:
Please note the analysis of each transaction done under the heading "particulars".
