Answer:
a. 1 Pound/1.29 or 0.78 Pound/Mark
b. Overvalued
Explanation:
a. What should the pound-mark exchange rate be in 2012?
Ratio of Pacifica pound to Atlantica mark in 2012 = 360/280 = 1.29
Or,
Ratio of Atlantica mark to Pacifica pound in 2012 = 280/360 = 0.78
Therefore, according to the relative purchasing power parity (PPP) theory, one Pacifica pound should equal to 1.29 Atlantica mark, i.e. 1 Pound/1.29 Mark.
This can also be stated differently that 1 Atlantica mark should equal to 0.78 Pacifica pound, i.e. 0.78 Pound/Mark.
b. If the actual pound per mark exchange rate is 0.5 pound/mark in 2012, is the mark overvalued or undervalued relative to its PPP value
Since the PPP pound per mark exchange rate value estimated in a above is 0.78 Pound/ Mark is higher than the actual pound per mark exchange rate of 0.5 pound/mark in 2012, mark is therefore overvalued.
Answer:
40 air conditioner and 60 fans yield a 1,900 dollar profit
Explanation:
We apply this constrain on excel solver tool.
Wiring Drilling Profit per unit Total Profit
AC 40 units 120 80 25 1000
Fan 60 units 120 60 15 <u> 900 </u>
240 140 1900 1,900
Answer:
predetermined overhead allocation rate is $228 per hour
Explanation:
given data
Estimated over head costs = $8,000,000
Estimated machine hours = 35,000
actual machine hours = 31,000
to find out
predetermined overhead allocation rate
solution
we know that predetermined overhead allocation rate is express as
predetermined overhead allocation rate = 
put here value
predetermined overhead allocation rate = 
predetermined overhead allocation rate = $228.571
so predetermined overhead allocation rate is $228 per hour
Answer:
Annual Interest = $80
Interest rate = 8.89%
Explanation:
The investor pays discounted price for this bond.
We know, Annual Interest = Coupon payment/Market value
Given,
Coupon payment = Principal value*Coupon rate
Coupon payment = $1,000*8% = $80
Market value = Price pays for the bond = $900
Therefore, the annual interest rate = $80/$900
Annual Interest rate = 8.89%
Note that, coupon payment is the annual interest rate.
Answer:According to the article, when companies earn patents specifically to prevent competition, it hinders the innovation of products that might actually be better. For instance, Bruce Nolop describes how his company had to pay more attention to the "minefield of existing patents than on the expected value that we could bring to customers." Rosabeth Moss Kanter suggests a "use it or lose it" solution to this problem. She thinks that a company that patents an item would be forced to use the patented idea or product or risk losing the patent. This idea would encourage more competition and prevent patent abuse.
Explanation:
