Answer:
Chavanprash is a ayurvedic health supplement and Patanjali toothpaste is a ayurvedic toothpaste,
Explanation:
Chavanprash is a ayurvedic health supplement that's been on this planet for ages. It has MANY benefits such as providing strength, immunity, and preserving vitality. You can eat this!
Patanjali toothpaste is toothpaste sold by Patanjali Ayurved company. Toothpaste is made using ayurvedic ways and is quite popular in India and with oversea indian crowd. The owner of the companies are very famous in the world of yoga: Baba Ramdev and Balkrishna. You cannot eat this!
No one can help you with that. It's asking for YOUR experience and we're not you, sorry.
Answer:
look around the word to see how it is used
replace the word with a more familiar word
Explanation:
It is common to read a text that has an unknown word, or difficult to understand, which makes it difficult to understand the text. The most common in these cases is for the reader to look for a dictionary that shows the meaning of the reading, but this can disrupt the reading pace. To avoid this, the reader can observe the words that are presented around the unknown word and identify the context that these words present. Through this context, the reader can understand what the meaning of the unknown word is and how it fits into that sentence.
The reader can also replace this unknown word with a similar word that he knows the meaning of. However, be careful with this strategy, as there are many false cognates in the language, which are similar words that have different meanings.
This poem written by Marianne Moore has had several versions written by the author herself, given her desire on being clear and precise. The first version of this poem appeared in 1919 and it comprised 30 lines, which then she cut down to 13 in 1925. Then, finally, in 1967, she published a final version that was cut down to only 4 lines. A lot of criticism has been given to this poem as it seems at first that the poet is literally saying that she dislikes poetry. However, this comes because the last version of the poem does not give the reader a glimpse into what the author means really and whether she truly dislikes all poetry or not. However, after much studying it is discovered that what Moore is saying is not that she dislikes all poetry, but only the type that has given precedence to intelligence over imagination and therefore becomes so convoluted that people are incapable of understanding it. She, in turn, defends the type that she considers good and acceptable poetry and she defines it as the one where the imagination overcomes the intelligence and the abstract and allows the reader to almost feel what the author is trying to convey. This can be seen in this particular excerpt from the line that says thus: "nor till the poets among us can be "literalists of the imagination" - above insolence and triviality and can present for inspection, "imaginary gardens with real toads in them," shall we have it."
