1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olegator [25]
3 years ago
7

What was the biggest problem with ratifying the Constitution? Please help hurry!!!!

History
2 answers:
pav-90 [236]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not. One of the major issues these two parties debated concerned the inclusion of the Bill of Rights.

Explanation:

Ivanshal [37]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not. One of the major issues these two parties debated concerned the inclusion of the Bill of Rights.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
WHAT WAS THE GREATEST ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF ANCIENT EGYPT?
julsineya [31]

Hello!

I believe the greatest accomplishment of Ancient Egypt is The Great Pyramid of Giza.

I hope it helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Summarize the reasons Native American culture<br> s irrevocably changed by the end of the 1800s.
Gemiola [76]

Answer:

Going around saying have a great day so.... HAVE A GREAT DAY!!!

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Define the Enlightenment
Gre4nikov [31]

Answer:

a European intellectual movement of the late 17th and 18th centuries emphasizing reason and individualism rather than tradition. It was heavily influenced by 17th-century philosophers such as Descartes, Locke, and Newton, and its prominent figures included Kant, Goethe, Voltaire, Rousseau, and Adam Smith.

5 0
3 years ago
Why did the Fugitive Slave Act anger Northerners? a) It contradicted the Missouri Compromise. b) It increased federal interventi
Papessa [141]

The answer is <u>b) It increased federal intervention in the affairs of independent states.</u>

By the time these federal Acts were enacted in the U.S., several Northern states had already abolished slavery but it was legal in the Southern states. The Fugitive Slave Acts of 1793 and 1850 allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves within the territory of the United States, aiming to prevent that the Northern states would become safe havens for runaway slaves.

The last act was more rigid in their provision and stated more regulation, including the guarantee of harsher punishments for anyone interfering in runaways slave's capture, the right of slave owners and their “agents” to search for escaped slaves within the borders of free states and compelled citizens to assist in their capture as well. It also denied slaves the right to a jury trial, among others.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 implied much government's intervention in the state's affairs, and this angered most northern states. They responded by intentionally neglecting the law or creating acts that nullified or that protected black people, the so-called "personal liberty laws", and by making great efforts to assist runaway slaves, among others.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
England started the Navigation Acts in the mid-1600s to
Hunter-Best [27]

                In the 1600s, for Britain to restrict colonial trade, the Navigation Acts were made.  The Parliament made the Acts to protect the British shipping against the Dutch and other foreign powers. The competition in trading was very evident during that time thus this was one of their purposes. Another is for Britain to have monopoly on colonial commodities like tobacco and sugar. During that time, the principle of mercantilism dominated when it comes to the economic system. The context stated that the nation’s wealth depends on accumulated supply of gold. As per conventional wisdom, wealth is limited because there is also a limited supply of gold. And imperialism states that primarily colonies, preferably through the discovery of gold but also through the production of natural resources, expanded its wealth. Mercantilist model states that open trade could only result to loss of wealth and this was what the Navigation Acts wanted to lessen if not abolish. The Acts were made for the purpose of retaining the imperial realm’s wealth where trading power had to utilize the colonies’ resources within a closed- trade system. 

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Friend or foe, mexico 5.06
    6·1 answer
  • On which two islands did the Vikings establish settlements before coming to North America?
    10·1 answer
  • How were Greco-Roman and Jewish ideas similar? Check all that apply.
    15·2 answers
  • Something fun but you still have to right 3 paragraphs
    5·1 answer
  • Why would a country want to limit the number of parties in its system?
    10·1 answer
  • Jomo Kenyatta caused discontent during his rule in Kenya by
    15·2 answers
  • What is determining the age of objects and bones called?
    14·1 answer
  • How does social environment, mass media, and interest groups influence public opinion?
    10·1 answer
  • How did World War I contribute to the African-American great migration
    12·1 answer
  • Why was The soviet invasion of hungary significant to the cold war
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!