Answer: Option B
Explanation:
A. Explicit cost are the cost paid to others in return of their service. Hence Option A is incorrect.
B. Revenue is the total amount of earnings a company have before deducting for expenses. Hence Option B is correct.
C. Accounting profit means (Revenue - explicit cost) . Hence Option C is incorrect.
D. Economic profit means (Revenue - explicit cost - implicit cost) . Hence Option D is incorrect.
Answer:
Direct material price variance= $20,100 unfavorable.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Direct materials 7 pounds at $0.60 per pound = $ 4.20
During the latest month, the company purchased and used 67,000 pounds of direct materials for $.90 per pound to produce 10,000 units of output.
Direct material price variance= (standard price - actual price)*actual quantity
Direct material price variance= (0.60 - 0.90)*67,000= $20,100 unfavorable.
Answer:
8.95%
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Time, n = 29 years
Principle amount = $200,000
Future value = $2,400,000
Now,
Using the compounding formula
Future value = Principle × [ 1 + r ]ⁿ
here,
r is the interest rate
Thus,
$2,400,000 = $200,000 × [ 1 + r ]²⁹
or
[ 1 + r ]²⁹ = 12
taking the natural log both the sides, we have
29 × ln(1 + r) = ln(12)
or
ln(1 + r) = 0.08569
or
1 + r = 
or
1 + r = 1.0895
or
r = 0.0895
or
r = 0.0895 × 100% = 8.95%
Answer:
NPV= 1,036.16
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Initial investment= $9,000
Cash flows= $2,700 at the end of each of the next four years.
Interest rate= 3%
To calculate the net present value (NPV), we need to use the following formula:
NPV= -Io + ∑[Cf/(1+i)^n]
Cf1= 2,700/1.03= 2,621.36
Cf2= 2,700/1.03^2= 2,545
Cf3= 2,700/1.03^3= 2,470.88
Cf4= 2,700/1.03^4= 2,398.92
Total= 10,036.16
NPV= -9,000 + 10,036.16
NPV= 1,036.16
<span>a) If energy prices go up, manufacturing costs go up, which ultimately increases the price of the notebook. This will also most likely lead to a decrease in quantity, as the manufacturing cost per unit is higher. This is a supply determinant.
b) In theory, the subsidy reduces the cost per unit to the manufacturer, which increases supply and often reduces price, again being a supply-side determinant. In reality, it creates an incentive for notebook manufacturers to keep doing what they are doing, disincentivizing cost-saving developments and alternatives. Why innovate when you can get free government cheese?
Anyway, supply determinant.
c) The price of an inferior good increasing tends to push some demand for superior goods, especially when the income to cost of good ratio remains the same for the inferior good but gets better for the superior one. Demand determinant. </span>
