Answer:
Situational interview.
Explanation:
In this scenario, an Human Resource (HR) manager asked every candidate during an interview to describe a situation in the past in which they had to display their leadership abilities even though they were not a formal leader, discuss what they did, and describe the result. This is an example of situational interview.
Situational interview can be defined as the process in which job applicants are made to describe or narrate how they acted in the past in a circumstance or conflict situation and how they were able to overcome the challenges.
Answer:
COGS= $89,250
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
First, we need to calculate the unitary cost of goods sold:
Unitary COGS= 105,000 / 35,000= $3
<u>Now, the new number of units sold:</u>
Units sold= 35,000*0.85= 29,750
<u>Finally, the COGS for 2020:</u>
COGS= 29,750*3
COGS= $89,250
Answer:
B) greater than $30 but less than $40
Explanation:
the options are missing:
A) less than or equal to $30
B) greater than $30 but less than $40
C) greater than $40 but less than $50
D) greater than $50
we must first calculate safety stock = (Z-score x √lead time x standard deviation of demand) + (Z-score x standard deviation of lead time x average demand)
- Z-score for 98% confidence level = 2.326
- standard deviation of demand = 30
- √lead time = √5 = 2.23607
- we are not given any standard deviation of lead time, so we can assume that it is 0
safety stock = (2.326 x √2.23607 x 30) + (2.326 x 0 x 300) = 156.03 ≈ 156 units
the annual holding cost of 156 units = 156 x $0.25 = $39
Answer:
Emergence.
Explanation:
In this context, it can be said that Suzanne, Kyle and Monique are in the emergence phase of group decision making.
This phase occurs right after the conflict phase, in the emergence phase the ideas will be finally defined and there will be a consensus among the team.
At this stage it is common for the individual interests and needs of the team members to be set aside in favor of the team's interests.
Therefore, project members also tend to adopt a more softening stance and opinions with the intention of not appearing dominant in relation to the project.