Answer:
Vern's depletion deduction is $175000
Explanation:
given data
mineral interest = $3,500,000
recoverable units = 500,000
mined = 40,000 units
sold = 25,000 units
depletion rate = 22%
to find out
Vern's depletion deduction
solution
we get here depletion expense that is
depletion expense =
...........................1
put here value we get
depletion expense =
depletion expense = $175000
and
percentage depletion = $800,000 × 22%
percentage depletion = $176000
we know that % depletion method is not accept as IRS for certain natural resources
so we use depletion method is use here
Vern's depletion deduction is $175000
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
C. Credit to Cost Of Goods Sold
Explanation:
Over allocation refers to the scenario of assigning more than actual manufacturing overhead costs. This means profits would be understated in such a scenario and costs overstated.
The journal entry for adjustment of overallocated manufacturing overheads is:
Manufacturing Overheads A/C Dr.
To Cost Of Goods Sold A/C
(Being rectification entry for over allocated manufacturing overheads recorded)
Cost of Goods Sold is an expense and expenses are debited. A credit to such an account reduces it's balance as in the case above.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
The cash balance as at the end of December 31 2020 is the net cash provided by operating activities, less net cash used by investing activities plus net cash provided by financing activities plus the beginning cash balance as at January 1, 2020
Net cash provided by operating activities = $569,000
Net cash used by investing activities = $988,000
Net cash provided by financing activities = $595,000
Beginning cash balance = $331,000
Closing cash balance = $569,000 - $988,000 + $595,000 + $331,000
Closing cash balance = $507,000
Answer: unaffected
Explanation:
We should note that a retrospective adjustment isn't necessarily needed when there's an alternation to a accounting estimate.
With regards to this Barney's retained earnings as of December 31, 2021, would neither be understated or overstated but would be unaffected.