Answer:
$20,670
Explanation:
Firm A Firm B
Actual Dumping 157 183
Pollution Permits Allotted <u> 11 </u> <u> 11 </u>
Reduction Required 146 172
Cost of Dumping 1 ton $160 $65
As the cost of dumping to Firm A is $160 which is higher than the marginal cost of dumping of Firm B which is $65, so it is better that Firm B take benefit from it by selling it at $65. So now total tons require dumping is 318 tons (146 + 172).
Total cost of reducing pollution = 318 tons * $65 = $20,670
Answer:
1. B. monopolizing the market by bundling its operating system with its Internet Explorer browser.
2. A. network externalities.
Explanation:
Lawsuit was filled againts Microsoft claiming that it was engaging in unfair trade practices by (B) monopolizing the market bu bundling its operating system with its internet explorer browser.
They argue that modern software can gain monopoly status and establish a barrier to entry through (A) network externalities.
Answer:
-$2,350
Explanation:
In this question, we have to compare the cost which is shown below:
If we considered the reworked cost, then the sales would be
= Sales - reworked cost
= $55,700 - $1,750
= $53,950
And the scrap value is $56,300
So, the financial disadvantage would be
= Sales without reworked cost - scrap value
= $53,950 - $56,300
= -$2,350
All other information which is given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it
The answer that is being depicted above is red flag. This is
a process or a way of having to provide reasonable explanation or to alert an individual
when there is a problem that is present in means of having to let them know
about it.
Answer:
a) $14,600.
Explanation:
The computation of the company total assets are shown below:
= Cash balance + supplies balance + equipment balance
where,
Cash balance = investment amount + borrowed amount - paid amount for equipment
= $6,200 + $3,200 - $2,120
= $7,280
And, the other item values would remain the same
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= $7,280 + $1,120 + $6,200
= $14,600
