Okay I think there has been a transcription issue here because it appears to me there are two answers. However I can spot where some brackets might be missing, bear with me on that.
A direct variation, a phrase I haven't heard before, sounds a lot like a direct proportion, something I am familiar with. A direct proportion satisfies two criteria:
The gradient of the function is constant s the independent variable (x) varies
The graph passes through the origin. That is to say when x = 0, y = 0.
Looking at these graphs, two can immediately be ruled out. Clearly A and D pass through the origin, and the gradient is constant because they are linear functions, so they are direct variations.
This leaves B and C. The graph of 1/x does not have a constant gradient, so any stretch of this graph (to y = k/x for some constant k) will similarly not be direct variation. Indeed there is a special name for this function, inverse proportion/variation. It appears both B and C are inverse proportion, however if I interpret B as y = (2/5)x instead, it is actually linear.
This leaves C as the odd one out.
I hope this helps you :)
Answer:
< 20
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this help idrk how to explain this one lol
Answer:
Perimeter of a triangle = add all sides
Both the legs of the isosceles triangle are always EQUAL.
x+4x-6+4x-6 = 60
9x-12 = 60
9x = 60+12
9x = 72
x = 8
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
#5
57.8 can be rounded to 60 because 57.8 is closer to 60 than 50 and 81 is relatively close to 80. if we had to estimate the quotient, we would have
60 ÷ 80 = 0.75
#8
2.8 can be rounded to 3 because 2.8 is closer to 3 than it is to 2 and 6 can be left alone because it will make our division easier.
3 ÷ 6 = 0.5
#11
737.5 can be rounded to 700 and 9 can be rounded to 10.
700 ÷ 10 = 100
